{"id":11845,"date":"2025-12-12T21:44:17","date_gmt":"2025-12-12T21:44:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/staging.kabbalah.info\/?post_type=book&p=11845"},"modified":"2026-01-23T13:24:34","modified_gmt":"2026-01-23T13:24:34","slug":"part-5-table-of-questions-for-topics-tes","status":"publish","type":"book","link":"https:\/\/www.kabbalah.info\/en\/part-5-table-of-questions-for-topics-tes\/","title":{"rendered":"Part 5 – Table of Questions for Topics"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

43. What is  YH<\/em> in  Keter, HaVaYaH<\/em> in the rest of the  Partzufim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

44. <\/strong>Why do the four  Otiot HaVaYaH<\/em> imply discernments of lacks?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

45. <\/strong>What do the  YV de HaVaYaH<\/em> imply?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

46. <\/strong>What do the  Hey Hey de HaVaYaH<\/em> imply?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

47. <\/strong>Why are the  Shorashim<\/em> of the  Sefirot<\/em> in  Malchut<\/em> of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

48. <\/strong>Where does the  Ohr Keter<\/em> that did not expand to the  Guf<\/em> stand?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

49. <\/strong>What is the function of the  Ohr Keter<\/em> that did not return to the  Guf<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

50. <\/strong>Why must the  Kelim de Guf<\/em> receive the  Orot <\/em>through the  Ohr Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

51. <\/strong>What is the meaning of the location of the  Ohr Keter<\/em> under  Malchut de Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

52. <\/strong>What is the inversion of the  Panim de Ohr Keter<\/em> to the  Shorashim<\/em> and its  Achoraim<\/em> to the  Anafim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

53. <\/strong>What is the sufficient  Yenika<\/em> of the  Orot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

54. <\/strong>What is sufficient  He\u2019arah<\/em> to generate offspring?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

55. <\/strong>What causes the  Ohr Keter<\/em> to return its  Panim<\/em> to the  Anafim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

56. <\/strong>What causes the  Ohr Keter<\/em> to return its  Achoraim <\/em>to the  Anafim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

57. <\/strong>How will the  Sefirot de Guf<\/em> generate changes in the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

58. <\/strong>What are  ZON de Keter de Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

59. <\/strong>What causes  ZON<\/em> to rise to  Malchut<\/em> of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

60. <\/strong>What is a sufficient reception for  ZON<\/em> from the  He\u2019arat Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

61. <\/strong>What is the result of the ascent of  ZON<\/em> to the  Malchut <\/em>of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

62. <\/strong>Why are all the  Eser Sefirot<\/em> of  Histalkut Aleph<\/em> that rose to the  Rosh<\/em> called  ZON de Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

63. <\/strong>How do the  Reshimo de Keter<\/em> connect with the  Reshimo de Hochma<\/em> into  Behinat ZON<\/em>of a single degree?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

64. <\/strong>What is the place of  ZON de Keter<\/em> when they ascend in the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

65. <\/strong>Who causes the ascent of the  Malchut<\/em> of the  Rosh <\/em>to  Yesod de Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

66. <\/strong>What does preparation of the  Tachtonim<\/em> to receive mean?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

67. <\/strong>What are the three kinds of Generality?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

68. <\/strong>Why are the  Reshimo de Keter<\/em> and  Reshimo de Nekeva<\/em> called  Zachar<\/em> and  Nekeva<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

69. <\/strong>What are the  Behinot<\/em> of the Orot de ZON de Keter of Hitpashtut Bet?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

70. <\/strong>How do the three  Orot, Ohr Keter<\/em> and  Zachar<\/em> and  Nekeva de Keter<\/em> stand at the  Malchut<\/em>of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

71. <\/strong>How many  Zivugim<\/em> are there to the  ZON de Keter<\/em> in the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

72. <\/strong>How is the  He\u2019arat Keter Elyon<\/em> extended by the  ZON<\/em> that rose to the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

73. <\/strong>How is it possible that  Malchut de Rosh<\/em> would rise to  Behina Gimel<\/em> and the  Orot<\/em> would not change their places?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

74. <\/strong>When are the  ZON<\/em> together in the  Yesod de Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

75. <\/strong>What is the  Hitkalelut <\/em>of the  Nekeva <\/em>in the  Zachar<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

76. <\/strong>What causes the descent of the degrees?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

77. <\/strong>Why does the  He\u2019arat Keter Elyon de Zivug Aleph<\/em> of the  Rosh<\/em> not extend to the  Guf<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

78. <\/strong>What makes  Ohr Keter<\/em> exit  Malchut<\/em> of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

79. <\/strong>What caused the  Zachar de Keter<\/em> mingle with the  Nekeva <\/em>in  Zivug Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

80. <\/strong>What does the  Hitkalelut <\/em>of  ZON de Keter<\/em> do in the two  Zivugim<\/em> of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

81. <\/strong>How were  ZON de Kli de Keter<\/em> emanated?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

82. <\/strong>How were  ZON de Kli de Hochma<\/em> emanated?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

83. <\/strong>How were ZON de Kli de Bina emanated?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

84. <\/strong>How many  Zivugim<\/em> are there in  ZON de Keter<\/em>, in  ZON de Hochma<\/em> and in  ZON de Bina<\/em>when they rise in  Malchut<\/em> of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

85. <\/strong>What is the difference between  ZON de Keter de AB de AK<\/em> and  ZON de Keter de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

86. <\/strong>What is the difference between ZON de Hochma de AB de AK and ZON de Hochma de SAG de AK?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

87. <\/strong>What is the difference between  ZON de Bina de AB de AK<\/em> and  ZON de Bina de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

88. <\/strong>What is the difference between the Five  Ktzavot de AB<\/em> and the  Five Ktzavot de SAG<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

89. <\/strong>What are the five  Orot<\/em> in the two  Kelim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

90. <\/strong>When is the name  YH<\/em> in  Keter Pashut<\/em> and when is it with a filling?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

91. <\/strong>When do four  Orot <\/em>ascend and when do five  Orot <\/em>ascend to the  Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

92. <\/strong>What is the filling in the  YH de Keter<\/em> when four  O<\/em>rot rise to  Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

93. <\/strong>What is the meaning of the  Otiot <\/em>of the filling?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

94. <\/strong>What are the fillings of  Yodin, Heyin,<\/em> and  Alephin<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

95. <\/strong>What is the meaning of  YH <\/em>without a filling?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

96. <\/strong>When do  ZON de Keter<\/em> equalize with each other and when is the  Zachar<\/em> greater than the  Nekeva<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

97. <\/strong>When are  ZON de Keter<\/em> in two  Kelim<\/em> and when are they in one  Kli<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

98. <\/strong>Why are  ZON de SAG de AK<\/em> in one  Kli<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

99. <\/strong>How does the  Nekeva de Keter<\/em> receive from  Keter Elyon<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

100. <\/strong>Why does the  Nekeva de Partzuf SAG de AK<\/em> receive only  VAK<\/em> of the  Zachar<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

101. <\/strong>Why is  ZON de Hochma<\/em> of  SAG de AK<\/em> called  VH<\/em> and not  YH<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

102. <\/strong>When do the  Orot<\/em> ascend and incorporate in the  Zachar de Keter<\/em> and when do the Orot<\/em> ascend and incorporate in the  Nekeva de Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

103. <\/strong>When do the  Orot <\/em>ascend, some in the  Nekeva<\/em> and some in the  Zachar<\/em> of  Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

104. <\/strong>Why was the ascent of  MAN <\/em>not caused in  Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em>, when  HB<\/em> rose to  Keter<\/em>, as in the ascent of  HB<\/em> to  Keter<\/em> in  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

105. <\/strong>What is raising  MAN<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

106. <\/strong>Why did all the  Orot<\/em> ascend to  MAN<\/em> to  Keter<\/em> in all the exits and the  Lo Matei<\/em> of Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>, and not to  Rosh<\/em>, as in  Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

107. <\/strong>What are the first  Kelim de Akudim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

108. <\/strong>What causes annulment of the  Kelim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

109. <\/strong>Where did the  Kelim<\/em> for the  Partzuf<\/em> of  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em> come from?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

110. <\/strong>Where did the  Kelim <\/em>for  Partzuf SAG de AK<\/em> come from?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

111. <\/strong>Why do  ZON de AB<\/em> have two  Kelim<\/em> and  ZON de SAG<\/em> only one  Kli<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

112. <\/strong>Why did all the  Orot<\/em> come to  Kli de Keter<\/em> together in  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

113. <\/strong>What are  Panim <\/em>and  Achor de Kelim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

114. <\/strong>Why are the  Kelim de Hitpashtut Bet<\/em> arrnged one below the other?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

115. <\/strong>What are the  Panim <\/em>and  Achor de KHB<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

116. <\/strong>Why are there no  Kelim <\/em>in the  Partzuf<\/em> due to the  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em> of itself?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

117. <\/strong>What is the difference between  Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em> and  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

118. <\/strong>How are the  Kelim de GAR<\/em> made?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

119. <\/strong>What are the causes of the completion of the  Kelim de GAR<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

120. <\/strong>What are the parts in the Kli that are worthy of looking into the  Ohr<\/em> even during the Histalkut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

121. <\/strong>What causes the  Kli<\/em> to turn its  Panim<\/em> downward and its  Achoraim<\/em> upward?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

122. <\/strong>What causes the  Kli<\/em> to turn its  Panim <\/em>to its place as in the beginning?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

123. <\/strong>What is  Histaklut<\/em> in the  Ohr Elyon<\/em> through the  Achor<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

124. <\/strong>How will the  Orot <\/em>be extended from  Keter<\/em> to  Hochma<\/em> when they are so far from each other?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

125. <\/strong>What two kinds of inversions of the  Panim<\/em> are implemented in the degrees?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

126. <\/strong>What causes the division of the  Sefirot Hochma<\/em> and  Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

127. <\/strong>Why do all the  Sefirot<\/em> remain in  Panim<\/em> and  Achor <\/em>after  Histalkut Aleph<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

128. <\/strong>Why did  Keter <\/em>and  Hochma<\/em> remain  Panim be Panim<\/em> after  Histalkut Aleph<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

129. <\/strong>Why is  Keter Achor be Achor<\/em> with the  Ohr Elyon<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

130. <\/strong>What is the meaning of a Moment in spirituality?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

131. <\/strong>When is the  Kli Malchut<\/em> completed in  Histalkut Aleph<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

132. <\/strong>When is  Kli ZA<\/em> completed in  Histalkut Aleph<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

133. <\/strong>Why is any less than three is considered filled?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

134. Why is the ascent of  ZA<\/em> to  Bina<\/em> not considered remoteness of degree?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

135. <\/strong>When was there  Lo Matei<\/em> in  Keter <\/em>for the first time?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

136. <\/strong>Why is  Histalkut Aleph<\/em> called  Lo Matei<\/em> in  Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

137. <\/strong>Who causes the  Lo Matei<\/em> in  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em> every time?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

138. <\/strong>Why were the  Matei ve Lo Matei<\/em> made into ten  Orot <\/em>and were not made into ten Kelim?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

139. <\/strong>Why is the permanent  Matei ve Lo Matei<\/em> compared to a flame swaying here and there?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

140. <\/strong>What is the ratio between  ZON de Hochma<\/em> and  ZON de Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

141. <\/strong>How is  Hesed<\/em> emanated?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

142. <\/strong>What is  Behinat Kli de Hesed<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

143. <\/strong>What is  Behinat Ohr de Hesed<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

144. What is the order of the emanation of the  Ohr<\/em> of  Gevura<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

145. <\/strong>What is the property of  Sefirat Gevura<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

146. <\/strong>What is the difference between  ZON de Bina<\/em> and  Sefirat Gevura<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

147. <\/strong>What is the order of the emanation of the  Ohr Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

148. <\/strong>What is the property of the  Kli de Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

149. <\/strong>How is the  Ohr Hesed<\/em> different when it is in  Bina<\/em> from when it is in  Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

150. <\/strong>What is  Ohr Daat<\/em> at its  Shoresh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

151. <\/strong>What is the essence of  Behinat ZA<\/em> in the  Hey Ktzavot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

152. <\/strong>What are the  Behinot RTS<\/em> in  ZAT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

153. <\/strong>What is the difference between  Hesed <\/em>and  Gevura<\/em>, and  Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

154. <\/strong>Why is the essence of  Ohr Hesed<\/em> not clothed in the  Sefirot <\/em>of  Hochma<\/em> and  Gevura<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

155. <\/strong>How is  Sefirat Netzah<\/em> emanated?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

156. <\/strong>What is the attribute of  Sefirat Netzah<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

157. <\/strong>What is the difference between  HGT<\/em> and  NHY<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

158. <\/strong>What is the attribute of the  Kli de Hod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

159. <\/strong>What is  Sefirat Yesod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

160. <\/strong>In which  Sefira<\/em> did  Ohr Malchut<\/em> clothe?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

161. <\/strong>What is the  Ohr<\/em> that clothed in  Kli Malchut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

162. <\/strong>What is the ratio between  ZON de Hochma<\/em> and  ZON de Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

163. <\/strong>How many  Behinot ZON<\/em> are there in  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

164. <\/strong>What is the attribute of the four  ZON<\/em> couples of  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

165. <\/strong>In which  Behina<\/em> did the  Zivug <\/em>stop and the  Ohr<\/em> of  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em> depart entirely?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

166. <\/strong>What is the second  Behina<\/em> of  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

167. <\/strong>How was  Partzuf SAG de AK<\/em> emanated?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

168. <\/strong>What are the  ZON<\/em> of  Kelim de KHB<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

169. <\/strong>What are the names of  ZON de KHB<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

170. <\/strong>What are the  Otiot<\/em> that designate  ZON <\/em>and the  Kelim<\/em> of  KHB<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

171. <\/strong>How many  Behinot<\/em> are there in  Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

172. <\/strong>What is the meaning of  Only He\u2019arah<\/em>, without giving  Orot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

173. <\/strong>Why did  Hochma<\/em> illuminate the  Vav<\/em> to  Bina<\/em> before the giving of the  Orot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

174. <\/strong>Why did  Keter<\/em> not give the  Yod <\/em>to  Hochma<\/em> from  Behinat He\u2019arah<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

175. <\/strong>When does  Hesed<\/em> need its mother and when does it not?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

176. <\/strong>Why does  Bina<\/em> rise to  Hochma<\/em> before it gives the  Ohr Hesed <\/em>to  Kli de Hesed<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

177. <\/strong>How did the  Hey de Zivug ZON<\/em> of  Bina<\/em> reach the  Kli Malchut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

178. <\/strong>What is the difference between the  Ohr Hesed<\/em> and the  Hey<\/em> from  Zivug ZON de <\/em>Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

179. <\/strong>How is the  Hey<\/em> separated into two separated degrees?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

180. <\/strong>Why can\u2019t the  Ohr Hesed<\/em> be a  Zachar <\/em>to  Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

181. <\/strong>Why can\u2019t the  Ohr Hesed<\/em> be a  Nekeva<\/em> to  Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

182. <\/strong>Which  Ohr<\/em> descended to complement the  Malchut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

183. <\/strong>What are the  ZON<\/em> in  Yesod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

184. <\/strong>How did the  Reshimo de Kli de Bina<\/em>, which is  GAR<\/em>, become a  Nekeva<\/em> to the  Yod<\/em> that was born from the  Zivug ZON de Hochma<\/em>, which is  VAK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

185. <\/strong>What are the five  Hassadim<\/em> and five  Gevurot<\/em> in the five  Ktzavot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

186. <\/strong>What are the five  Hassadim<\/em> and five  Gevurot<\/em> in  Yesod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

187. <\/strong>What is  Matei<\/em> in  Keter de Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

188. <\/strong>Why is it that when  Matei <\/em>in  Keter, Lo Matei<\/em> in  Hochma<\/em> and  Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

189. <\/strong>Why is it that when  Matei <\/em>in  Hochma, Lo Matei <\/em>in  Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

190. <\/strong>Why is it that when  Matei<\/em> in  Bina, Lo Matei<\/em> in  Hesed<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

191. <\/strong>What is  Matei<\/em> in  Hesed <\/em>and in  Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

192. <\/strong>What is  Matei<\/em> in  Keter Partzuf SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

193. <\/strong>What is  Matei<\/em> in  Hochma de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

194. <\/strong>What is  Matei<\/em> in  Bina de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

195. <\/strong>What is  Matei <\/em>in  Hesed de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

196. <\/strong>What is  Matei <\/em>in  Hod<\/em> and not  Matei <\/em>in  Yesod de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

197. <\/strong>Why is it that when  Matei <\/em>in  Keter, Gevura, Netzah,<\/em> and  Yesod, Lo Matei <\/em>Hochma, Bina<\/em>and  Hesed, Tifferet, Hod,<\/em> and  Malchut de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

198. <\/strong>Why is it that when  Matei<\/em> in  Hochma, Bina<\/em>, and  Hesed, Tifferet, Hod,<\/em> and  Malchut, Lo Matei<\/em> in  Keter, Gevura, Netzah,<\/em> and  Yesod de SAG de AK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

199. <\/strong>Why is it that when  Matei<\/em> in  Malchut de SAG de AK<\/em>, it returns to being  Matei<\/em> in  Keter<\/em>, and so on and so forth?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

200. <\/strong>Why does the  Masach de Behina Bet<\/em> rely on the  Achoraim de Bina<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

201. <\/strong>Why are the  Eser Sefirot de Rosh<\/em> always called  GAR<\/em>, and the  Eser Sefirot de Guf<\/em>named \u201cThe Seven Lower  Sefirot<\/em>\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

202. <\/strong>Why is every  Partzuf Tachton<\/em> considered  Behinat VAK<\/em> with respect to its  Elyon<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

43. <\/strong>What is  YH<\/em> in  Keter<\/em>,  HaVaYaH <\/em>in the rest of the  Partzufim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Hitpashtut <\/em>and Histalkut <\/em>that were in Partzuf Keter <\/em>de <\/em>AK<\/em> is called YH<\/em>. Hitpashtut <\/em>Bet<\/em> and Histalkut <\/em>Bet<\/em> that were in Partzuf <\/em>AB <\/em>de <\/em>AK<\/em> is called VH<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The YH<\/em> in Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em> are also contained in Hitpashtut <\/em>Bet<\/em> since all the forces in the Elyon<\/em> are necessarily present in the Tachton <\/em>as well. You find, that YH<\/em> is in the Keter<\/em>, meaning in Partzuf Keter <\/em>de <\/em>AK<\/em>, and HaVaYaH <\/em>in the rest of the Partzufim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 23, and Ohr Pnimi <\/em>par. \u201cHe writes\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

44. <\/strong>Why do the four  Otiot <\/em>HaVaYaH <\/em>imply discernments of lacks?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Otiot<\/em> are Kelim<\/em>. It is known that the Histalkut <\/em>of the Ohr<\/em> and its absence cause the making of the Kli<\/em>. Hence it is necessary that in each Ot<\/em> of the four Otiot <\/em>HaVaYaH <\/em>there is some Behina<\/em> of lack of Ohr<\/em>. This is the cause for the making of that Ot<\/em>, meaning that Kli<\/em>, and for this reason the Otiot<\/em> are Behinot<\/em> lackes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi <\/em>Item 24)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

45. <\/strong>What do the  YV <\/em>de <\/em>HaVaYaH <\/em>imply?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Yod<\/em> implies the Hitpashtut Ohr<\/em> of the Nekudot <\/em>de <\/em>Partzuf Keter<\/em>, which are the Komot<\/em> that came out there from Hochma <\/em>down. Vav<\/em> implies the Hitpashtut Ohr<\/em> of the Nekudot<\/em> of Partzuf <\/em>AB <\/em>de <\/em>AK<\/em>, meaning from Hochma <\/em>down of this Partzuf <\/em>too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, there is no sign for the Hitpashtut <\/em>of Komat <\/em>Keter<\/em> in the four Otiot <\/em>HaVaYaH<\/em>, neither for Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Partzuf Keter<\/em>, nor for Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Partzuf AB<\/em>. It is so because there is no discernment of a lack there, for which the Otiot<\/em> would be written (see answer 44).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 24)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

46. <\/strong>What do the  Hey <\/em>Hey <\/em>de <\/em>HaVaYaH <\/em>imply?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The First Hey<\/em> implies the general Histalkut de <\/em>Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em>, and the last Hey<\/em> implies the general Histalkut de <\/em>Hitpashtut <\/em>Bet<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(There, and Ohr Pnimi<\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

47. <\/strong>Why are the  Shorashim<\/em> of the  Sefirot <\/em>in  Malchut <\/em>of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because the whole matter of the vessels of reception, called Guf<\/em>, are because of the Ohr Hozer <\/em>that Malchut <\/em>raises in her Hakaa<\/em> on the Ohr Elyon <\/em>from her and above in the Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>. Through this Ohr Hozer<\/em>, Malchut <\/em>acquires strength to expand from her and within her from above downward to Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Hitlabshut<\/em>, called Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It means that the entire amount that the Ohr Hozer <\/em>clothed in the Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Rosh<\/em> from below upward themselves invert and clothe the Eser <\/em>Sefirot <\/em>of the Guf<\/em>. Thus, Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Guf<\/em> are Anafim<\/em>(lit. Branches) of the Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 1)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

48. <\/strong>Where does the  Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> that did not expand to the  Guf<\/em> stand?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It stands under Malchut <\/em>of the Rosh<\/em>, meaning under its Shoresh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(There)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

49. <\/strong>What is the function of the  Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> that did not return to the  Guf<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It gives to its Anaf<\/em> (lit. Branch) that stands at the Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Guf<\/em>, which is the Behinat <\/em>Zachar <\/em>of Keter<\/em>. It also detains the He\u2019arat <\/em>GAR<\/em> from expanding to the Partzuf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi <\/em>item 40 par. \u201cWe must understand\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

50. <\/strong>Why must the  Kelim <\/em>de <\/em>Guf<\/em> receive the  Orot<\/em> through the  Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because although the Orot<\/em> departed from the Guf<\/em>, they still receive enough Ohr<\/em> to sustain them. They receive this He\u2019arah<\/em> through the Keter<\/em> that departed from them and rose under Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>, since it is the Shoresh <\/em>for every Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Guf<\/em>, as the Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> always contains all the Eser <\/em>Sefirot <\/em>that expand through it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 3, and Ohr Pnimi<\/em> there)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

51. <\/strong>What is the meaning of the location of the  Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> under  Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It indicates that it is an Ohr<\/em> without a Kli<\/em>, hence it cannot expand from above downward to the Guf<\/em>. Its being under the Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em> and above the Kelim <\/em>de <\/em>Guf<\/em> indicates that it is a middle, an intermediate between Behinat <\/em>Rosh<\/em> and Behinat <\/em>Guf<\/em>, shining from its place to the Guf<\/em> through its Reshimo<\/em> that stands at Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(There)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

52. <\/strong>What is the inversion of the  Panim <\/em>de <\/em>Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> to the  Shorashim<\/em> and its  Achoraim <\/em>to the  Anafim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It causes its Anafim<\/em> in the Guf<\/em>, which are ZON<\/em> in Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em> that receive its He\u2019arah<\/em>, to not be able to bestow that great Ohr<\/em> that they receive from it to the Tachtonim<\/em> from Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Guf<\/em>. This is so because Achoraim de <\/em>Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> are Behinat<\/em> detainment and cessation on its He\u2019arah<\/em> so as not to expand from Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Guf<\/em> downward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Items 4 and 5)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

53. <\/strong>What is the sufficient  Yenika <\/em>of the  Orot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is a sufficient He\u2019arah<\/em> to descend below to Hitlabshut <\/em>in the Guf<\/em> to mate and generate offspring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 3)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

54. <\/strong>What is sufficient  He\u2019arah<\/em> to generate offspring?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Through two Zivugim<\/em> that are induced in Malchut<\/em>, ZON<\/em> acquire the force to descend downward to Hitlabshut <\/em>in the Guf<\/em> and generate offspring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi <\/em>item 3, Sub Header \u201cThe  Keter<\/em><\/strong>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

55. <\/strong>What causes the  Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> to return its  Panim<\/em> to the  Anafim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Through the ascents of the Zachar de <\/em>Keter<\/em>, namely Behina Dalet de <\/em>Hitlabshut<\/em>, with the Nekeva de <\/em>Keter<\/em>, namely Behina Gimel <\/em>in complete Aviut<\/em> both from Hamshacha <\/em>and from Hitlabshut<\/em>, these ZON<\/em>incorporate in one another in a common Aviut<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At that time the Zachar <\/em>attains both from Behinat <\/em>Hamshacha <\/em>and these common MAN<\/em> themselves cause a Behinat <\/em>Zivug <\/em>Elyon<\/em> in Malchut <\/em>of the Rosh<\/em> and the Koma<\/em> that comes out of this Zivug<\/em>attains up to Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>. Also, the Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> in Malchut <\/em>receives this great Ohr<\/em> and administers it to its Anafim<\/em>, which are ZON<\/em>. This is considered that it returned its Panim<\/em> to its Anafim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi <\/em>item 9, par. \u201cThus, Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

56. <\/strong>What causes the  Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> to return its  Achoraim<\/em> to the  Anafim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ascents of ZON<\/em> to the Rosh<\/em> mean that the Aviut<\/em> in them purified and their Tzura<\/em> equalized with Behinat <\/em>Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>. This causes the Zivug<\/em> in Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>, extending the Ohr<\/em> from Keter <\/em>Elyon<\/em> (see answer 55).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At that time the Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> returns its Panim<\/em> to the Anafim<\/em> and dispenses them the Ohr <\/em>de <\/em>Keter <\/em>Elyon<\/em>. However, after the second Zivug<\/em>, when ZON<\/em> have already sucked enough to descend to the Guf<\/em> for Hitlabshut <\/em>in the Kelim<\/em>, the Orot <\/em>de <\/em>ZON<\/em> are found to be returning and thickening in the Aviut <\/em>de <\/em>Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At that time they cause that Behinat<\/em> intermediate Aviut<\/em> (mentioned in answer 51) that exists in the Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em>. This is its Behinat <\/em>Achoraim<\/em>, preventing its He\u2019arah<\/em> from the Guf<\/em> since it lacks the Behina Dalet de <\/em>Hamshacha<\/em>. For this reason no vessel of reception extends from the first Zivug<\/em>, and this lack of vessels of reception is in itself its Behinat <\/em>Achoraim <\/em>to the Anafim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi <\/em>item 10)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

57. <\/strong>How will the  Sefirot de <\/em>Guf<\/em> generate changes in the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

These changes and operations that the Behinot <\/em>Guf<\/em> cause to be renewed in the Eser <\/em>Sefirot <\/em>of the Rosh<\/em>, do not refer to the very essence of the Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>, but only to the Malchut <\/em>and the Masach <\/em>in it. This is according to the Ohr Hozer <\/em>that she raises up from below upward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For this reason Malchut <\/em>is considered the Shoresh <\/em>of all the Kelim<\/em> and the Orot<\/em> in them and all the incidents in the Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Guf<\/em>. Hence, when her Anafim<\/em> acquire equivalence of form with her, they instantly return to her, as a branch that returns to its root.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Through this return, the branches are renewed and they cause Behinat<\/em> renewed Aviut<\/em> in the Masach <\/em>in Malchut<\/em>. The Ohr Elyon<\/em>, which does not stop for a moment mates on the new form of Aviut<\/em> that the Masach <\/em>attained by the Hitkalelut <\/em>of the Anafim<\/em> in it. At that time a Koma<\/em> of new Eser <\/em>Sefirot <\/em>comes out \u201cin potential\u201d, appearing \u201cde facto\u201d from there to the Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi<\/em> item 6, Sub Header \u201cThey<\/strong>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

58. <\/strong>What are  ZON <\/em>de <\/em>Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Hitpashtut <\/em><\/strong>Bet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Zachar de <\/em>Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em> is the Behinat <\/em>Reshimo <\/em>de <\/em>Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Keter <\/em>de <\/em>Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em> that was renewed in the Zivug <\/em>Elyon<\/em> of the Rosh<\/em>. The Nekeva <\/em>is the actual Ohr<\/em> of Komat <\/em>Hochma <\/em>that came out through a Zivug <\/em>de <\/em>Ohr Elyon <\/em>on Aviut <\/em>de <\/em>Behina Gimel <\/em>from Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em> upward, which turned over and descended to the Guf<\/em> from Malchut <\/em>down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 9, and Ohr <\/em>Pnimi<\/em>, Sub Header \u201cThis extends<\/strong>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

59. <\/strong>What causes  ZON<\/em> to rise to  Malchut <\/em>of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Hizdakchut Masach <\/em>in Tabur <\/em>de <\/em>Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em> until it became Zach<\/em> in equal form to the Masach de <\/em>Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em> is considered that the Masach <\/em>of Tabur<\/em> rose to the Rosh<\/em>. As it ascends, in the order of degrees of the Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Guf<\/em>, the Masach <\/em>is incorporated with all the Reshimot <\/em>in the Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The two Reshimot de <\/em>Zachar <\/em>and Nekeva de <\/em>Keter<\/em> are the Upper ones among them, containing all of them, hence when this Masach <\/em>rose to the Rosh<\/em>, it brought these Reshimot <\/em>along with it, meaning ZON <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em>. Thus, the Hizdakchut <\/em>of the Masach de <\/em>Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em> caused ZON <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em> to ascend upward to the Rosh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi<\/em> item 4, Sub Header \u201cRise<\/strong>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

60. <\/strong>What is a sufficient reception for  ZON<\/em> from the  He\u2019arat <\/em>Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

After the two Zivugim<\/em> of ZON<\/em> in the first Zivug<\/em> ended, which was the Hitkalelut <\/em>of the Nekeva <\/em>in the Zachar<\/em>, they extended the Ohr<\/em> from the Keter <\/em>Elyon<\/em>. However, they still did not have the strength to turn over and expand downward to the Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is so because the Aviut <\/em>de <\/em>Behina Dalet <\/em>of the Zachar <\/em>was lacking the Behinat <\/em>Hamshacha <\/em>of Behina Dalet <\/em>since Malchut <\/em>did not leave a Reshimo<\/em>. That Aviut <\/em>de <\/em>Behina Dalet de <\/em>Hitlabshut<\/em> was sufficient to make a Zivug <\/em>de <\/em>Rosh<\/em> by joining with the Reshimo <\/em>de <\/em>Behina Gimel<\/em>. However, she was still not enough to make a Behinat<\/em> vessel of reception for Hitlabshut <\/em>in the Guf<\/em> through this Ohr Hozer<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hence, the ZON<\/em> could not descend to the Guf<\/em> until a second Zivug<\/em> was made, where there was a Hitkalelut <\/em>of the Zachar <\/em>in the Nekeva<\/em>, and the Zivug<\/em> came out on Behina Gimel<\/em>, which has Behinat <\/em>Hamshacha<\/em> as well. At that time Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em> could expand from her and within her to Eser <\/em>Sefirot de <\/em>Guf<\/em> through the Chazeh<\/em> and the ZON<\/em> could come down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi<\/em> item 4, Sub Header \u201cOnce<\/strong>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

61. <\/strong>What is the result of the ascent of  ZON<\/em> to the  Malchut <\/em>of the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

ZON\u2019s<\/em> ascent upwards was caused by the making of a Zivug<\/em> on Behina Gimel<\/em>. That, in turn, lowered only Komat <\/em>Hochma <\/em>to the Guf<\/em> and Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> remained in the Rosh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, the degrees descended because the Ohr <\/em>Hochma <\/em>clothed in Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em> and the Ohr <\/em>Bina<\/em> in Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Hochma <\/em>etc. It therefore follows that each and every Kli<\/em> remained lacking much of that measure of Ohr<\/em> that it had in Hitpashtut Aleph<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For this reason the Aviut<\/em> in the Kelim<\/em> had been recognized and they were completed in a way that they will not be cancelled by the Ohr<\/em> clothing in them. It follows that the ascents of ZON<\/em> caused the completion of the Kelim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi<\/em> item 5, Sub Header \u201cIt was<\/strong>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

62. <\/strong>Why are all the  Eser <\/em>Sefirot <\/em>of  Histalkut Aleph<\/em> that rose to the  Rosh<\/em> called  ZON <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is because the Upper Sefira<\/em> contains all the Sefirot <\/em>below it. Hence, the Reshimo <\/em>de <\/em>Behina Dalet <\/em>contains all the Reshimot <\/em>below her, but because she lacks Behinat <\/em>Hamshacha<\/em>, she must therefore join with the Behina Gimel<\/em>. Hence, Behina Gimel <\/em>too merits a name, and they are all named after the two Reshimot<\/em>, which are ZON <\/em>de <\/em>Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi <\/em>item 6, par. \u201cKnow, that the essence\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

63. <\/strong>How do the  Reshimo <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em> connect with the  Reshimo <\/em>de <\/em>Hochma <\/em>into  Behinat <\/em>ZON<\/em>of a single degree?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Reshimo <\/em>de <\/em>Behina Dalet<\/em>, which is the Zachar de <\/em>Keter<\/em>, is only half a Reshimo<\/em>, its weaker half, which is only Behinat <\/em>Hitlabshut<\/em>. However, the Reshimo <\/em>de <\/em>Behina Gimel <\/em>is complete with two Behinot <\/em>Aviut<\/em>: Hitlabshut <\/em>and Hamshacha<\/em>. The Zachar <\/em>becomes needy of the Nekeva<\/em>, to the extent that there is Hishtavut<\/em> between them, and they become ZON<\/em> of a single degree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi <\/em>item 6, par. \u201cYou should know\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

64. <\/strong>What is the place of  ZON <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em> when they ascend in the  Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under the root Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em> that stands under Malchut <\/em>of the Rosh<\/em>, since the ZON<\/em> are the Anafim<\/em> of that Ohr <\/em>Keter<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 9, and Ohr Pnimi <\/em>par. \u201cRemember these three names\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

65. <\/strong>Who causes the ascent of the  Malchut <\/em>of the  Rosh<\/em> to  Yesod <\/em>de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The coming of Behina Gimel<\/em>, which is the Nekeva de <\/em>Kli <\/em>de <\/em>Keter<\/em> to the place of Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>. It causes a corresponding ascent of Malchut de <\/em>Rosh<\/em> to Yesod <\/em>de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>, being Behina Gimel de <\/em>Rosh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Ohr Pnimi<\/em> item 6, Sub Header \u201cThey remain<\/strong>\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

66. <\/strong>What does preparation of the  Tachtonim<\/em> to receive mean?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

See answer to question No. 13.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

67. <\/strong>What are the three kinds of Generality?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n