{"id":11851,"date":"2025-12-12T22:49:37","date_gmt":"2025-12-12T22:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/staging.kabbalah.info\/?post_type=book&p=11851"},"modified":"2026-01-23T23:31:10","modified_gmt":"2026-01-23T23:31:10","slug":"part-7-table-of-questions-and-answers-for-topics-tes","status":"publish","type":"book","link":"https:\/\/www.kabbalah.info\/en\/part-7-table-of-questions-and-answers-for-topics-tes\/","title":{"rendered":"Part 7 – Table of Questions and Answers for Topics"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

91. Why are  Nekudim <\/em>called  HaVaYaH de SAG<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

92. Where is the  Malchut <\/em>in each  Sefira<\/em> from?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

93. Why are there  Klipot <\/em>opposite the  BON<\/em> from its  Rosh<\/em> to its  Raglaim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

94. Why is there no  Yenika <\/em>to the  Sitra Achra <\/em>from  GAR de ZA<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

95. Why is  Malchut <\/em>called  Nekuda<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

96. What are the four situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>, and where are there three situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

97. What causes the state of  Panim be Achor<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

98. What causes the state of  Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

99. Where are there four situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>, and where are there three situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

100. How do the  HG<\/em> complement a complete  Achor<\/em> for  ZA<\/em> and a complete  Achor<\/em> for  Nukva<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

101. How does the  MAN<\/em> that is raised to  ZON<\/em> extend new  Orot<\/em>, if every  Hidush Ohr<\/em> should be from  Ein Sof<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

102. What are the  GAR de ZA<\/em> that take from  AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

103. What are the two reasons in the  HG<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

104. How many  Partzufim<\/em> came out in the  Nekudim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

105. What is the reason for the breaking of the vessels?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

106. Which  Orot<\/em> were cancelled from  AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

107. What is the  Koma<\/em> of  Melech ha Daat<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

108. What is the  Koma<\/em> of  Melech ha Hesed<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

109. What is the  Koma<\/em> of  Melech ha Gevura<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

110. What is  Komat Tifferet <\/em>until the  Chazeh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

111. What is  Komat<\/em> Two Lower Thirds of  Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

112. What is  Komat NH<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

113. What is the  Komat Yesod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

114. What is the  Komat Malchut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

115. How did  Gadlut de AVI de Nekudim <\/em>emerge?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

116. How did  Komat YESHSUT de Nekudim <\/em>emerge?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

117. How did the  Zivug<\/em> of the two  Ketarim<\/em> (pl. for  Keter<\/em>) in  Daat de Nekudim <\/em>emerge?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

118. Why is there only  HG<\/em> in  Daat de AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

119. What are the  NRNHY de ZA<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

120. Why is the  Yesod<\/em> entirely  Panim<\/em>, and has no  Achoraim <\/em>at all?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

121. Why is  Tifferet <\/em>divided into two halves, more than the other  Sefirot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

122. Why are the  Gufim de AVI<\/em> drawn to the place of  DHGT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

123. Why is Upper  AVI<\/em> not regurded as the  Rosh<\/em> of  ZON<\/em>, but as  YESHSUT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

124. Why did the  Achoraim de AVI<\/em> not fall to  BYA<\/em> like the  ZON<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

125. Why did the  Achoraim de AVI<\/em> fall to  Behinat Guf<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

126. Where did the  Hitpashtut KHB<\/em> to the new  Kelim de HGT<\/em> come from?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

127. Why were the  Achoraim de AVI<\/em> made into  Behinat MAN<\/em> that the  ZON<\/em> raise to them?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

128. Which  Behinot Kelim<\/em> of the Seven  Melachim <\/em>fell to  Yetzira <\/em>and  Assiya<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

129. Where did the  Orot<\/em> of the Seven  Melachim <\/em>leave their  Reshimot <\/em>after their departure?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

130. Why where the  Reshimot <\/em>arranged in  NHYM de Atzilut <\/em>in an opposite order,  Daat<\/em>below, and  Tifferet <\/em>above all?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

131. Why did the  Reshimot <\/em>of the  Dalet Melachim DHGT<\/em> fell to  NHYM de Atzilut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

132. Why did the  Reshimo<\/em> of the Upper third of  Tifferet <\/em>remain in its place unchanged?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

133. Which change was there in the  Reshimo<\/em> of the two lower thirds of  Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

134. Who brought the  Reshimot <\/em>back to the new  Kelim DHGT de Atzilut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

135. Why did the four  Melachim DHGT<\/em> descend to  GAR de Beria<\/em>,  Yetzira<\/em>, and  Assiya<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

136. Why were there two falls in the  Melachim <\/em>of  DHGT<\/em>, one for  GAR de BYA<\/em>, and another for  NHYM de BYA<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

137. Who magnified the  Kli de Keter<\/em> up to the place of  Chazeh de Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

138. Who complemented the new  Kli de Tifferet <\/em>from the place of the  Chazeh <\/em>to its  Sium<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

139. How do the new  Kelim de HGT<\/em> come from  Hitpashtut KHB de Nekudim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

140. How was the  Zivug<\/em> of the two  Ketarim de Daat<\/em> made after the breaking of the four Melachim NHYM<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

141. Who reared the  Kelim<\/em> of the new  Tifferet<\/em>,  Netzah<\/em>,and  Hod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

142. What are the causes for the elicitation of the  Katnut <\/em>and  Gadlut de AVI de Nekudim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

143. Who raised  MAN<\/em> for the Upper  Zivug AB <\/em>SAG<\/em> for the  Gadlut de AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

144. What did the inner  Orot<\/em> that came out through the  Tabur<\/em> and the  Yesod de AK<\/em> do?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

145. Why did the  GAR<\/em> and  ZAT de Eser Sefirot de Nekudim <\/em>emerge at once?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

146. Since the Seven  Melachim <\/em>do not belong to  AVI<\/em>, which are only from  Behina Bet<\/em>, they had to emerge from  NHY de AK<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

147. What is the essence of the  Achoraim de AVI<\/em> that fell?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

148. Where is the place of the fall of each of the four  Komot de Achoraim de AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

150. What are the four reasons that preceded the  Zivug AVI Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

151. What are the twelve actions accustomed in every  Melech<\/em> of the four  Melachim DHGT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

152. What are the four reasons that preceded the  Zivug Panim be Panim de YESHSUT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

153. What are the eleven operations that were in each of the four  Melachim TNHYM<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

154. Why did the ascent of  Malchut <\/em>in the  Zivug<\/em> of the two  Ketarim de Daat<\/em> tie all the  VAK<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

155. What are the 103 operations that emerged from one another in an order of cause and effect from after the situation  de Achor be Achor de AVI<\/em> until after  Tikun Kavim<\/em> of the new Kelim Tifferet<\/em>,  Netzah<\/em>, and  Hod<\/em>, made after the breaking of the vessels?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

YESHSUT <\/em>and the  Melachim <\/em>of  TNHYM<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Abbreviation for Cause and Consequence, without Explanations.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

91. Why are  Nekudim <\/em>called  HaVaYaH de SAG<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is so because there is Koma<\/em> of Behina Bet <\/em>in Behinat Hitlabshut<\/em> there, which is Behinat Israel Saba<\/em>, and YESHSUT <\/em>is Behinat HaVaYaH de SAG<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

92. Where is the  Malchut <\/em>in each  Sefira<\/em> from?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Through the ascent of the Hey Tata’a <\/em>in the Eynaim <\/em>that was in Tzimtzum Bet<\/em>. It means that when the Malchut <\/em>rose in Hochma<\/em>, Malchut<\/em> mixed and connected in each and every Sefira<\/em> up to Hochma<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

93. Why are there  Klipot <\/em>opposite the  BON<\/em> from its  Rosh<\/em> to its  Raglaim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because the Seven Melachim<\/em>, named BON<\/em>, emerged in a complete Partzuf Rosh<\/em> and Guf<\/em>, and broke Panim<\/em> and Achor<\/em>. For this reason they have Klipot <\/em>from its Rosh<\/em> to its Raglaim<\/em>, meaning in its entire RTS<\/em>. All the Behinot Rosh<\/em> of the Seven Melachim <\/em>fell to Beria<\/em>, all the Behinot Toch<\/em> of the Seven Melachim <\/em>fell to Yetzira<\/em>, and all the Behinot Sof<\/em> of the Seven Melachim <\/em>fell to Assiya<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

94. Why is there no  Yenika <\/em>to the  Sitra Achra <\/em>from  GAR de ZA<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is because during the Katnut<\/em>, it lacks GAR<\/em>, as it is so from its very creation. However, during the Gadlut<\/em> it attains the GAR<\/em> in Behinat <\/em>addition, and the Klipot <\/em>have no Yenika <\/em>from there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is so because when the Tachtonim<\/em> blemish, before the flaw appears, the GAR<\/em> immediately leave the ZA<\/em>. This is so because as long as it does not come with the Partzuf <\/em>from the beginning of its creation, it can leave the Partzuf <\/em>when necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

95. Why is  Malchut <\/em>called  Nekuda<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Malchut <\/em>is always called Nekuda<\/em>, after the root Malchut<\/em> over which there was the first Tzimtzum<\/em>. Therefore, the actual carrier of the Tzimtzum <\/em>and the Masach <\/em>over which the Zivug<\/em> is made, are called Nekuda<\/em> in every place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

96. What are the four situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>, and where are there three situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The four situations are Achor be Achor<\/em>, Achor be Panim<\/em>, Panim be Achor<\/em>, and Panim be Panim<\/em>. It means that when the Zachar <\/em>and Nukva<\/em> lack GAR<\/em> because of the ascent of the Hey Tata’a <\/em>in the Eynaim<\/em>, the first Tikun<\/em> that suffices to support them in Atzilut <\/em>is Achor be Achor<\/em>. It means that they obtain the Ohr Achoraim <\/em>of Upper Ima<\/em>. Because she craves Ohr de Hassadim<\/em>, by way of \u201cbecause He delighteth in mercy,\u201d you find that she rejects the Ohr Hochma<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, when they are incorporated in this Ohr<\/em> and in these Achoraim<\/em>, they are not at all blemished due to the lack of Hochma <\/em>in them because of the Hey Tata’a <\/em>in the Eynaim<\/em>. This is because even if they could receive Hochma<\/em>, they would still reject its reception due to the craving for Hassadim <\/em>imprinted in the Achoraim<\/em> of Upper Ima<\/em>. Hence, the Achoraim de Ima<\/em> serves them as He\u2019arat GAR<\/em>, and this is the first Tikun<\/em>, called Achor be Achor<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second situation is Achor be Panim<\/em>. Besides the diminution of the lessening of He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>by the Hey Tata’a <\/em>in the Eynaim<\/em>, there is lessening and diminution of He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>in the Kelim de Panim<\/em> of the Nekeva <\/em>as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because of the blockage on Ohr de Hassadim <\/em>that there is in her Kelim de Panim<\/em>, she is unfit to receive He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>, as there He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>is not received in the Partzuf <\/em>without Hassadim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, after the lessening because of the Hey Tata’a <\/em>in the Eynaim<\/em> was corrected by the above Zivug de Achor be Achor<\/em>, the Zivug<\/em> of Achor be Panim<\/em> was made. The Zachar <\/em>gives her Ohr de Hassadim <\/em>abundantly and corrects the Kelim de Panim<\/em> of the Nekeva<\/em>, thus qualifying her to be fit to receive He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>in them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The third situation is Panim be Achor<\/em>. This comes to them by the Zivug Elyon de AB SAG<\/em> that lowers the Hey Tata’a <\/em>from the Eynaim <\/em>and returns the HB<\/em> to the Rosh<\/em>. At that time the Zachar <\/em>acquires his Ohr Panim <\/em>as in the beginning, prior to the lessening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the Nekeva <\/em>does not return her Panim<\/em> to the Panim de Zachar <\/em>to receive He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>without a reason that compels her to it. This is so because her Achoraim <\/em>are in the form of Bina de Ohr Yashar<\/em>, by way of, \u201cbecause He delighteth in mercy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, at that time the Nekeva<\/em> receives the Ohr Panim<\/em> from the Zachar <\/em>through her Achoraim<\/em>. The He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>is greatly diminished by that, and this Zivug<\/em> is called Panim be Achor<\/em>. The Panim<\/em> of the Zachar <\/em>dispense to the Nekeva <\/em>through her Achoraim<\/em> and the Kelim de Panim<\/em> receive from the Kelim de Achoraim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fourth situation is Panim be Panim<\/em>. This comes to them only through raising MAN<\/em> from Behinat ZON<\/em>, since Bina<\/em> is connected with the ZON<\/em> by way of the Eser Sefirot de Ohr Yashar<\/em>, where Bina<\/em>dispenses them He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, when ZON<\/em> rise to her to MAN<\/em>, she stops her Achoraim <\/em>and returns her Panim<\/em> to the Hochma <\/em>to receive He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>from him for the ZON<\/em>, and in that state she mates with the Hochma Panim be Panim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Items 23-25 and Ohr Pnimi <\/em>there)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

97. What causes the state of  Panim be Achor<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Zachar <\/em>acquires his Behinat Panim<\/em> through the Zivug Elyon de AB SAG<\/em> that lowers the Hey Tata’a <\/em>from the Eynaim <\/em>and returns the HB<\/em> to the Rosh<\/em>. However, the Nekeva <\/em>is still in need of raising MAN<\/em>, hence their Zivug<\/em> is made in Behinat Panim be Achor<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

98. What causes the state of  Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Raising MAN<\/em> to the Bina<\/em> from the Behinat ZON<\/em> awakens the Bina<\/em> to return Panim<\/em> to Hochma<\/em> (see answer 96).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

99. Where are there four situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>, and where are there three situations until  Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

All the situations, Achor be Achor<\/em>, Achor bePanim<\/em>, Panim be Achor<\/em>, and Panim be Panim<\/em>, are implemented in ZON<\/em>. However, Behinat Achor be Panim<\/em> does not apply in AVI<\/em>, only Achor be Achor<\/em>, Panim be Achor<\/em>, and Panim be Panim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

100. How do the  HG<\/em> complement a complete  Achor<\/em> for  ZA<\/em> and a complete  Achor<\/em> for  Nukva<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the ZON<\/em> are in Behinat Achor be Achor<\/em>, there is only the wall of HGT<\/em> in them, being the Behinat Achoraim de Ima<\/em> (See answer 96). You find, that they both use this Achoraim<\/em>, half for ZA<\/em>and half for Nukva<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Achoraim <\/em>of the NHY<\/em> are absent in both, as they are in the form of, \u201cand all their hinder parts were inward.\u201d This is because the Achoraim de NHY<\/em> are from Behinat Yesod de Abba<\/em>, which appears only through Hassadim <\/em>and new Gevurot<\/em>, which are in He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hence, when HG<\/em> come from the Zivug Panim be Panim de AVI<\/em>, the Achoraim de NHY<\/em> are completed for both, ZA<\/em> takes the Hassadim <\/em>for itself, and gives the Gevurot<\/em> to the Nukva<\/em> (see above answer 45).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

101. How does the  MAN<\/em> that is raised to  ZON<\/em> extend new  Orot<\/em>, if every  Hidush Ohr<\/em> should be from  Ein Sof<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the lower Adam<\/em> raises MAN<\/em> to ZON<\/em> through good deeds, so the ZON<\/em> scrutinize from the Achoraim de AVI<\/em> that fell to their place and raise MAN<\/em> for AVI<\/em>. Also, AVI<\/em> extend Mochin <\/em>from Ohr Ein Sof <\/em>above them through all the degrees until the first Partzuf Elyon<\/em>, and lowers them to the one below it, and so they are passed to ZON<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, any raising of MAN<\/em> from the righteous induces a new descent of the Ohr<\/em> from Ein Sof <\/em>itself, as there is no Hidush<\/em> of Ohr<\/em> in all the Olamot<\/em> that does not extend from Ein Sof<\/em>, and remember that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

102. What are the  GAR de ZA<\/em> that take from  AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

They are primarily Hassadim <\/em>and Gevurot<\/em>, though there is He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>in them according to the measure of Koma<\/em> present in AVI<\/em> at that time. If they are in Komat Keter<\/em>, these Mochin<\/em> are from Behinat He\u2019arat Hochma de Partzuf Keter<\/em>. If they are in Komat Hochma<\/em>, the Mochin <\/em>are found to be from Behinat He\u2019arat Hochma de Partzuf Hochma <\/em>etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

103. What are the two reasons in the  HG<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first is that these new HG<\/em> where there is He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em> rear and complete the Achoraim de ZON<\/em> (See answer 100). The second is that they acquire the Mochin de Panim<\/em>, which are their GAR<\/em>, and then mate Panim be Panim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 29)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

104.How many  Partzufim<\/em> came out in the  Nekudim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Three Partzufim<\/em> came out in Nekudim<\/em>: AVI<\/em> in four Komot<\/em>, whose Gufim<\/em> are Daat<\/em>, Hesed<\/em>, Gevura<\/em>, and the upper third of Tifferet <\/em>until the Chazeh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second Partzuf <\/em>is YESHSUT <\/em>in four Komot<\/em>. Their Gufim<\/em> are the two lower thirds of Tifferet<\/em>, NH<\/em>, Yesod<\/em>, and Malchut<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The third is the Zivug<\/em> of the two Ketarim<\/em> in Daat<\/em> that came out a Rosh<\/em> without a Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

105. What is the reason for the breaking of the vessels?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There were many causes there, but what caused their death and descent to BYA<\/em> was the mixture of Behina Dalet<\/em>, which is unfit to receive from the Ohr Elyon<\/em>, that mingled in these Kelim<\/em> of the Seven Melachim<\/em>. Thus, when the Ohr<\/em> came to meet Behina Dalet<\/em>, it immediately departed and separated itself from the entire Kli<\/em>, and the Kli<\/em> died and fell to BYA<\/em>, meaning below the line of Ein Sof <\/em>that ends with the Karka de Atzilut<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They fell there into the Klipot<\/em>, and after they are sorted and the mixtures of Behina Dalet <\/em>are separated from them, they are returned to Atzilut<\/em> by way of the revival of the dead, and this is done by the new MA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

106. Which  Orot<\/em> were cancelled from  AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Only the Orot<\/em> that came out of Zivug de Gadlut de AVI<\/em> were cancelled, but what was present in AVI<\/em>from the beginning of their creation was not cancelled at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 31)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

107. What is the  Koma<\/em> of  Melech ha Daat<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His Rosh<\/em>, meaning the Behinat <\/em>from below upward, is the Rosh de AVI<\/em>, called Histaklut Eynaim de AVI<\/em> at each other. He emerged on Behina Dalet de Hitlabshut <\/em>and Behina Gimel<\/em> from the Aviut<\/em>, which were incorporated in one another, eliciting Komat Keter<\/em>. The Guf<\/em> of this Komat Keter<\/em>, which is its from above downward, expanded in Melech ha Daat<\/em>, and it is Behinat Yechida de ZON<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

108. What is the  Koma<\/em> of  Melech ha Hesed<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His from below upward is called Guf de Abba<\/em>, which came out on Behina Gimel de Hitlabshut <\/em>and Behina Bet <\/em>from the Aviut<\/em>, whose Koma<\/em> is up to Hochma<\/em>. The Guf<\/em> of this Koma<\/em> expanded in Melech ha Hesed<\/em> and it is Behinat Haya de ZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Items 42, 43)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

109. What is the  Koma<\/em> of  Melech ha Gevura<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His from below upward is called Guf de Ima<\/em>, which came out on merely Aviut de Behina Bet<\/em>, whose Koma<\/em> is up to Bina<\/em>, and the Guf<\/em> expanded in Melech ha Gevura<\/em>, and it is Behinat Neshama de ZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 43)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

110. What is  Komat Tifferet <\/em>until the  Chazeh<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His from below upward is called Yesodot<\/em> (pl. for Yesod<\/em>) de AVI<\/em>. He came out on Aviut de Behina Aleph<\/em>, whose Koma<\/em> is up to ZA<\/em>, and from above downward of this Koma<\/em> expanded in Melech ha Tifferet <\/em>until his Chazeh<\/em>, and it is Behinat Ruach de ZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 45)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

111. What is  Komat<\/em> Two Lower Thirds of  Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His from below upward is called the Rosh<\/em> of YESHSUT <\/em>and Histaklut Eynaim de YESHSUT <\/em>at each other. He emerged on a Masach <\/em>from Behina Gimel de Hitlabshut <\/em>and from Aviut de Behina Bet<\/em> whose Koma<\/em> is up to Hochma<\/em>. His Guf<\/em> expanded in Melechha Tifferet <\/em>in his lower two thirds of the Chazeh <\/em>down to his Sium<\/em>, and it is Behinat Haya de Neshama de ZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 45)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

112. What is  Komat NH<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His from below upward is called Guf de YESHSUT<\/em>. He emerged on Masach de Behina Bet<\/em>, and his Guf<\/em>expanded in the Melechde Netzah <\/em>and Hod<\/em>, and he is Behinat Neshama <\/em>from the Neshama deZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 46)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

113. What is the  Komat Yesod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His from below upward is called Yesodot de YESHSUT<\/em>, which came out on Aviut<\/em> of Behina Aleph<\/em>. His Koma<\/em> is up to ZA<\/em>, his Guf<\/em> expanded in Melechha Yesod<\/em>, and he is Behinat Ruach de ZA<\/em> of the Neshama<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 47)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

114. What is the  Komat Malchut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

His from below upward is called Malchut de YESHSUT<\/em>. He emerged on Masach de Behinat Shoresh<\/em>, whose Koma<\/em> is up to Malchut<\/em>. His from above downward expanded in the seventh Melech<\/em>, which is Malchut<\/em>, and he is Behinat Nefesh de Neshama de ZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 47)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

115. How did  Gadlut de AVI de Nekudim <\/em>emerge?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

See below answer 150.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

116. How did  Komat YESHSUT de Nekudim <\/em>emerge?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

See below answer 152.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

117. How did the  Zivug<\/em> of the two  Ketarim<\/em> (pl. for  Keter<\/em>) in  Daat de Nekudim <\/em>emerge?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

See below answer 154.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

118.Why is there only  HG<\/em> in  Daat de AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The whole return of Panim de Ima<\/em> to Panim de Abba<\/em> was primarily in order to dispense He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>to the ZON<\/em> by the force of the connection that she has to administer He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>to the ZON<\/em> from the relation of Ohr Yashar<\/em>. Hence, after her Zivug Panim be Panim<\/em> with Abba<\/em>, she still receives from him only as much as Bina de Ohr Yashar <\/em>administers Hochma <\/em>to the ZON de Ohr Yashar<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is known that the essence of ZON de Ohr Yashar <\/em>is Ohr de Hassadim<\/em>, but in He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>that Bina<\/em> dispenses it. Hence, here too she gives it primarily only Hassadim <\/em>and Gevurot<\/em>, but only with He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For this reason, Ima<\/em> does not receive Ohr Hochma <\/em>in Keter<\/em> from Abba<\/em> even in AVI<\/em>, which are in Komat Keter<\/em>, but only He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>in the ZON de Keter<\/em>. This is a measure of a Koma<\/em> from below upward in AVI<\/em>, called Daat de AVI<\/em>, and discerned as Behinat Rosh<\/em> of Melech ha Daat<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 41 and Ohr Pnimi<\/em> item 9)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

119. What are the  NRNHY de ZA<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two factors operate together in the values of the five Komot de NRNHY de ZA<\/em>: the first is the measure of the Koma de AVI<\/em> itself. This extends from the state of Panim be Achorde AVI<\/em>, meaning according to the place of the descent of the Hey Tata’a<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If up to the Peh<\/em>, they have Komat Keter<\/em>; ifup to the Hotem<\/em>, they have Komat Hochma<\/em>; and if up to the Awzen<\/em>, they have Komat Bina<\/em>. If returning back to the Eynaim<\/em>, they have Komat ZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second element is the Behinat MAN<\/em> that rose to Ima<\/em>, awakening her to the Zivug Panim be Panim<\/em>, when they do not extend from the entire Koma de AVI<\/em>, but only from the He\u2019arat Hochma de ZON<\/em> in the same Koma AVI de ZON<\/em> are. Thus, if AVI<\/em> are in Komat Keter<\/em>, He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>in ZON de Keter<\/em> extends, and it is Yechida de ZA<\/em>. If AVI<\/em> are in Komat Hochma<\/em>, only He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>extends in ZON de Hochma<\/em>, which is Haya de ZA<\/em>. If AVI<\/em> are in Komat Bina<\/em>, He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>is extended in ZON de Bina<\/em>, and she is Neshama de ZA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

120. Why is the  Yesod<\/em> entirely  Panim<\/em>, and has no  Achoraim <\/em>at all?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because the Achoraim de AVI<\/em> fell and were cancelled, meaning only what came to them in Behinat <\/em>addition to their actual creation is Behinat Achor be Achor<\/em>. Hence, the Achoraim <\/em>did not fall from the Behinat Yesodot de AVI<\/em>, as AVI<\/em> have already returned Achorbe Achor<\/em>, even before the Zivug Yesodot de AVI<\/em> emerged, meaning right after the Guf de Ima<\/em> was cancelled. For this reason the Orot<\/em> of Yesod<\/em>are entirely Panim<\/em> from the Behinat <\/em>beginning of their emanation, and it contains no Behinat Achoraim <\/em>that descended from it at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 44)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

121. Why is  Tifferet <\/em>divided into two halves, more than the other  Sefirot<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because Tifferet <\/em>relates to the Hey Hassadim <\/em>as Bina<\/em> to the Hey Behinot<\/em>. Thus, Bina<\/em> is divided into two halves, Bina<\/em> and Tvuna<\/em>. B ina<\/em> is Ohr Hassadim <\/em>without Hochma <\/em>and it is Behinat GAR<\/em>, meaning before she emanated the ZON de Ohr Yashar<\/em>. Tvuna<\/em> is in He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>, and she is Behinat ZAT de Bina<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When she emanated ZON de Ohr Yashar <\/em>in He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>, she came out from Behinat Atzmut <\/em>of Bina<\/em>, which is mere Ohr Hassadim<\/em>, and acquired a new name, Tvuna<\/em>. She is Behinat He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>that remains in the Shoresh Bina<\/em> even after she emanated to ZON<\/em>, hence Tvuna<\/em> is considered ZAT de Bina<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since the Tifferet<\/em> is Behinat Bina<\/em> of the Hey Hassadim<\/em>, it is therefore divided as Bina<\/em> is, into GAR<\/em>until the Chazeh<\/em>, and to ZAT<\/em>, from the Chazeh <\/em>down to its Sium<\/em>. It too, like the Bina<\/em>, only Ohr de Hassadim <\/em>illuminate in its GAR<\/em> until the Chazeh<\/em>, and the He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>disappears there in Yesod de Bina<\/em>. In its ZAT<\/em> from the Chazeh <\/em>down, it is in disclosed He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em> since the Yesod de Ima<\/em>has already stopped in the place of the Chazeh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

122. Why are the  Gufim de AVI<\/em> drawn to the place of  DHGT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because the DHGT<\/em> in the Hey Hassadim <\/em>are like the KHBD de Hey Behinot KHB ZON<\/em>. For this reason their Orot<\/em> were drawn from their corresponding relation in the Hey Behinot<\/em>. Ohr Yechida <\/em>extends to the Daat<\/em>; Ohr Haya<\/em> extends to the Hesed<\/em>, which is Behinat Hochma de Hassadim<\/em>. Ohr Haya<\/em> extends to the Hesed<\/em>, which is Behinat Hochma de Hassadim<\/em>, Ohr Neshama <\/em>extends to the Gevura<\/em>, which is Behinat Bina de Hey Hassadim<\/em>, and Ohr Ruach<\/em> extends to the Tifferet<\/em>, which is Behinat Daat de Hey Hassadim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

123. Why is Upper  AVI <\/em>not regarded as the  Rosh<\/em> of  ZON<\/em>, but as  YESHSUT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

You already know the division of Bina<\/em> and Tvuna<\/em> into two halves, GAR<\/em> and ZAT<\/em>. The GAR<\/em> are Behinat Bina<\/em> before she emanated the ZON<\/em>, at which time she is only Ohr de Hassadim<\/em>. This is Behinat <\/em>Upper AVI<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ZAT<\/em>, which is Behinat Bina<\/em> after she emanated the ZON<\/em>, has He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>too, called Tvuna<\/em>, and this is Behinat YESHSUT<\/em>. Now you can understand that Upper AVI<\/em> are not at all designated to be Rosh de ZON<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the whole essence of the Upper AVI<\/em>, is because they are Behinat Bina<\/em> before they emanated the ZON<\/em>. They have only Ohr de Hassadim<\/em>, which is not at all from the Behinat ZON<\/em>, which are only Behinat Hassadim <\/em>in He\u2019arat Hochma<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hence, only the YESHSUT<\/em>, which are Behinat ZAT de AVI<\/em> that emanated the ZON de Ohr Yashar<\/em>, and have He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>in them, which is the entire degree of ZA<\/em>, are always considered Rosh de ZON<\/em>in all the Partzufim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

124. Why did the  Achoraim de AVI <\/em>not fall to  BYA<\/em> like the  ZON<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is because the cancellation de Achoraim de AVI<\/em> was not due to a mixture of the Dinim<\/em>, which are the Behina Dalet<\/em>, but only because of the Hizdakchut <\/em>of the Masach<\/em>. Hence, they were not entirely disqualified from Behinat Atzilut<\/em>, but were only cancelled temporarily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, as long as they have no one to dispense to, they are cancelled. But when the Kelim<\/em>return from BYA<\/em> to Atzilut<\/em>, they too return to bestow upon them as in the beginning. For this reason they are only in Behinat <\/em>temporary cancellation, not in Behinat <\/em>, breaking and death like the seven Melachim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Behinat He\u2019arat Achor be Achor de AVI<\/em> too reached the above-mentioned Achoraim<\/em>, called Hitpashtut Gimel Kavim KHB<\/em> to the Achoraim <\/em>that stand in HGT<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 14)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

125. Why did the  Achoraim de AVI <\/em>fall to  Behinat Guf<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because all these four Komot<\/em> that emerged in the Gadlut de AVI<\/em> came out on the MAN de Vav<\/em> and Nekuda de Yesod AK <\/em>, which are the general Behinat ZON<\/em> and Behinat Guf<\/em>, and are not at all from Behinat AVI<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead, when they were incorporated in the Zivug de AVI<\/em> itself and operated there in Behinat MAN<\/em>, extending He\u2019arat Hochma <\/em>for the seven Melachim<\/em>, they had a place in Rosh de AVI<\/em>. However, after the Zivug<\/em> on them has been cancelled, they no longer have a place there, and they must return to their place in the Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 14)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

126. Where did the  Hitpashtut KHB<\/em> to the new  Kelim de HGT<\/em> come from?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The four Komot<\/em> emerged in AVI de Gadlut <\/em>and in NHY de Keter<\/em> and served them as Mochin<\/em>, which were in Behinat KHB de Nekudim<\/em>, corrected in Tikun Kavim<\/em>. Now, after they were cancelled and fell to their Behinat Gufim<\/em>, they drew the Behinat Tikun Kavim de KHB<\/em> with them into the places they fell to, and these Achoraim <\/em>too were corrected in Tikun Kavim<\/em> like the KHB<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

127. Why were the  Achoraim de AVI <\/em>made into  Behinat MAN<\/em> that the  ZON<\/em> raise to them?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because those Achoraim <\/em>that fell from AVI<\/em> are the Behinat MAN<\/em> that AVI<\/em> received from the Yesod de AK<\/em>. Hence, once they have fallen to the place of ZON<\/em>, the ZON<\/em> raises them back to Behinat MAN<\/em> to AVI<\/em> from all the Komot<\/em> in them, which are NRNHY<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

128. Which  Behinot Kelim<\/em> of the Seven  Melachim <\/em>fell to  Yetzira <\/em>and  Assiya<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Behinat Toch<\/em> in all the Kelim<\/em> fell to Yetzira<\/em>, and the Behinat Sof<\/em> in all the Kelim<\/em> fell to Assiya<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

129. Where did the  Orot<\/em> of the Seven  Melachim <\/em>leave their  Reshimot <\/em>after their departure?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Reshimot de Dalet Melachim DHGT<\/em> first descended to Behinat NHYM de Atzilut<\/em>. Afterwards they clothed in the new Kelim DHGT<\/em> that were made of the Achoraim de AVI de Nekudim<\/em>. The Reshimo de Dalet Melachim TNHYM<\/em> first rose to the new Kelim de DHGT<\/em>, and then descended from there and clothed the new Kelimde Tifferet<\/em>, Netzah<\/em>, and Hod<\/em>, made of the Achoraim de YESHSUT<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

130. Why where the  Reshimot <\/em>arranged in  NHYM de Atzilut <\/em>in an opposite order,  Daat<\/em>below, and  Tifferet <\/em>above all?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

During the Hitlabshut <\/em>of the Orot<\/em> in the Kelim<\/em>, the more Av<\/em> is considered more important and more Elyon<\/em>. It is inverted after the Histalkut Orot<\/em> from the Kelim<\/em>, as then the more Av<\/em> is lower.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, since the Daat<\/em> was the highest during the Hitlabshut<\/em>, you find that during the Histalkut<\/em>, he is the lowest. Hesed<\/em>, whose Aviut<\/em> is less than him, is above it, and the Gevura<\/em>, whose Aviut<\/em> is less than Hesed<\/em>, is above Hesed<\/em>. The Tifferet<\/em>, whose Aviut<\/em> is less than all, is the highest. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

((Histaklut Pnimit item 19)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

131. Why did the  Reshimot <\/em>of the  Dalet Melachim DHGT<\/em> fell to  NHYM de Atzilut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Their Kelim<\/em> broke and fell to BYA<\/em>. Hence, they came as close to them as they could in order to illuminate them in Behinat Tagin<\/em> over the Otiot<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 20)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

132. Why did the  Reshimo<\/em> of the Upper third of  Tifferet <\/em>remain in its place unchanged?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Its Kli<\/em>, which is the upper third of Tifferet<\/em>, fell only to Behinat <\/em>from the Chazeh <\/em>downward. Hence, it did not have to descend at all, as it was cleaved to it from its place in Behinat Tagin<\/em> over it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Item 28)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

133. Which change was there in the  Reshimo<\/em> of the two lower thirds of  Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It did not stay in its place, but rose and clothed the new Kli<\/em> of the upper third of Tifferet <\/em>that was made of the Achoraim de AVI<\/em>. Regardless, it is not a great change since in the end, they are two halves of one Kli<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 30)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

134. Who brought the  Reshimot <\/em>back to the new  Kelim DHGT de Atzilut<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Rosh de YESHSUT <\/em>clothed the entire place of the four Melachim DHGT<\/em> from below upward. It is Behinat Hitpashtut Bet<\/em>, whose conduct is to fill the empty Kelim<\/em> and the Reshimot <\/em>of the Guf de Elyon<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hence, he illuminated to these Reshimot <\/em>of the four Melachim <\/em>of DHGT<\/em>, which are Behinat <\/em>its Guf<\/em> of the Elyon<\/em>, meaning de AVI<\/em>, and drew them to their place in the new Kelim<\/em> in order to clothe them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

135. Why did the four  Melachim DHGT<\/em> descend to  GAR de Beria<\/em>,  Yetzira<\/em>, and  Assiya<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Melachim <\/em>of DHGT<\/em> are Behinot GAR de ZAT<\/em>, and are therefore ascribed to GAR de BYA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

136. Why were there two falls in the  Melachim <\/em>of  DHGT<\/em>, one for  GAR de BYA<\/em>, and another for  NHYM de BYA<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the Reshimot <\/em>were close to them in Behinat Tagin<\/em> over the Otiot<\/em> in the place of NHYM de Atzilut<\/em>, they could sustain themselves in GAR de BYA<\/em> since they too are Behinat GAR de ZAT<\/em>. However, after the Reshimot <\/em>had distanced and clothed in the new Kelim<\/em> and in the Rosh de YESHSUT<\/em>, their He\u2019arah<\/em> stopped from the Kelim<\/em>. For this reason they fell to the last level de BYA<\/em>, which is the place of NHYM de BYA<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 25)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

137. Who magnified the  Kli de Keter<\/em> up to the place of  Chazeh de Tifferet<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Achoraim de Daat de AVI<\/em> that was clothed in NHY de Keter de Nekudim <\/em>expanded in the middle line and became the new Kelim de Daat<\/em> and Tifferet<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

138. Who complemented the new  Kli de Tifferet <\/em>from the place of the  Chazeh <\/em>to its  Sium<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Behinat Achoraim <\/em>that fell from the Rosh de YESHSUT<\/em>, which fell from the place from the Chazeh <\/em>up to the place from the Chazeh <\/em>downward. They were corrected in Behinat <\/em>middle line through the He\u2019arat Rosh<\/em> from the Zivug<\/em> of the two Ketarim<\/em> in Daat<\/em> and increased the Kli de Tifferet <\/em>through its Sium<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 32)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

139. How do the new  Kelim DHGT<\/em> come from  Hitpashtut KHB de Nekudim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

These Achoraim de AVI<\/em> come from Behinat AVI<\/em> and NHY de Keter<\/em>, being KHB de Nekudim<\/em>, corrected in Tikun Kavim<\/em> at their very creation in Behinat Achor be Achor<\/em> through the luminescence of the Upper Ima<\/em>. Hence, after they\u2019d fallen from the Rosh<\/em> to the place of DHGT<\/em>, they are also given from Behinat Achor be Achor de AVI<\/em> that were not cancelled, and their Tikun Kavim<\/em> extends on the Achoraim <\/em>too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 22)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

140. How was the  Zivug<\/em> of the two  Ketarim de Daat<\/em> made after the breaking of the four Melachim NHYM<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

After Kli Malchut <\/em>was also broken and the Masach de YESHSUT <\/em>purified from every Behinat Aviut<\/em> that it had, you find that it rose and incorporated in the Zivug<\/em> of Rosh de YESHSUT<\/em>. Behina Bet<\/em>disappeared, being the last Behina<\/em>, and only the Aviut de Behina Aleph <\/em>remained. Hence, only Komat ZA<\/em> emerged on it, which is Behinat Hesed<\/em> and Gevura<\/em>, called Bet Ketarim de Daat<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 32)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

141. Who reared the  Kelim<\/em> of the new  Tifferet<\/em>,  Netzah<\/em>,and  Hod<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The new Kelim Tifferet<\/em>, Netzah<\/em>, and Hod<\/em>, were made through the Achoraim de YESHSUT <\/em>that fell to the place of TNHY<\/em>, and through their clothing in the new Rosh<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 32)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

142. What are the causes for the elicitation of the  Katnut <\/em>and  Gadlut de AVI de Nekudim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Katnut de Nekudim <\/em>until Behinat Achor be Achor de AVI<\/em> emerged from the Reshimot de SAG<\/em>, contained in the Masach<\/em>. Also, the Gadlut de Nekudim <\/em>and the seven Melachim <\/em>emerged from the Reshimot de NHY de AK<\/em> contained in the Masach<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

143. Who raised  MAN<\/em> for the Upper  Zivug AB <\/em>SAG<\/em> for the  Gadlut de AVI<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

MA<\/em> and BON de AK<\/em>, which are NHY de AK<\/em>, rose to MAN<\/em> to the Upper AB SAG<\/em>, mated Panim be Panim<\/em>, and lowered the Hey Tata’a <\/em>from the Eynaim<\/em>, returning all the AHPs<\/em> to their preliminary degree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 4)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

144. What did the inner  Orot<\/em> that came out through the  Tabur<\/em> and the  Yesod de AK<\/em> do?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The new Ohr<\/em> that fissured the Parsa<\/em> and came out through the Tabur<\/em>, lowered the Hey Tata’a <\/em>from the Eynaim de Keter<\/em>, and AVI<\/em> returned to the Rosh<\/em> and came to a state of Panim be Achor<\/em>. The Ohr<\/em>that came out through Yesod de AK<\/em> to AVI<\/em> became MAN<\/em> for AVI<\/em>, brought them to a state of Panim be Panim<\/em>, and elicited the Seven Melachim de Nekudim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 5)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

145. Why did the  GAR<\/em> and  ZAT de Eser Sefirot de Nekudim <\/em>emerge at once?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When GAR de Nekudim <\/em>emerged, AVI<\/em> were in Behinat Achor be Achor<\/em>, where there is no Hitpashtut <\/em>to the Guf<\/em> from them. For this reason they needed the Zivug de AB SAG<\/em> and the MAN de Yesod de AK<\/em>, and then they came in a Zivug Panim be Panim<\/em> and expanded to their Gufim<\/em>, which are the seven Melachim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 6)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

146. Since the Seven  Melachim <\/em>do not belong to  AVI<\/em>, which are only from  Behina Bet<\/em>, they had to emerge from  NHY de AK<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is because according to the order of degrees, Komat ZA<\/em> emerges only from AVI<\/em>, which are Behinat SAG<\/em>, and not from NHY de AK<\/em>, which is Behinat Galgalta<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

()<\/p>\n\n\n\n

147. What is the essence of the  Achoraim de AVI <\/em>that fell?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

They are the Behinat Vav<\/em> and Nekuda de Yesod de AK<\/em>, meaning the general ZON<\/em>, and all the Reshimot<\/em> of the four Komotde Gadlut <\/em>with their dresses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 15)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

148. Where is the place of the fall of each of the four  Komot de Achoraim de AVI <\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Each Rosh<\/em> of the four Komot<\/em> fell into Behinat <\/em>its own Guf<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Histaklut Pnimit item 15)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

150. What are the four reasons that preceded the  Zivug AVI Panim be Panim<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a7 The first is the ascent of MAN<\/em> from NHY de AK<\/em> to the Upper AB SAG<\/em>, which mates them together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a7 The second, a new Ohr<\/em> that came out of Zivug de AB SAG<\/em> that fissured the Parsa<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a7 The third, the descent of that new Ohr<\/em> below Tabur<\/em> and its exit to Keter de Nekudim<\/em>, which lowered the Hey Tata’a <\/em>from Eynaim de Keter<\/em> to the Peh de Nekudim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a7 The fourth, the He\u2019arah<\/em> that emerged through the Yesod<\/em> to AVI<\/em> and became a MAN<\/em> to the seven Melachim<\/em>, which returned AVI Panim be Panim<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Cause and Consequence item 2)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

151. What are the twelve actions accustomed in every  Melech<\/em> of the four  Melachim DHGT<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n