Article No. 30, 1986<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the portion, Balak, The Zohar<\/em> writes (item 15), \u201cIf you say that so the Creator wished\u2014to give the birthright to Israel, this is improper. Come and see: Esau was a Klipa<\/em> [shell\/peel] and Sitra<\/em> Achra<\/em>. It is known that the Klipa<\/em> precedes the marrow, hence he emerged first. Once the Klipa<\/em> has emerged and was removed, the marrow was found. The first foreskin, which is Esau, is outside. Hence, he emerged first. The covenant, which is the most precious, meaning Jacob, appeared next. Therefore, Esau\u2019s early emergence does not regard his birthright, for he is a Klipa<\/em> and foreskin, completely worthless compared to the marrow and the covenant. He only emerged first for the reason that the Klipa<\/em> precedes the fruit.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n We should understand why he needs to answer. After all, our sages have already answered this question (introduced by RASHI in the beginning of the portion, Beresheet<\/em> [in the beginning]): \u201cRabbi Yitzhak said, \u2018The Torah should have begun from, \u2018This month is to you\u2026\u2019 which is the first Mitzva<\/em> [commandment] that Israel were commanded. What is the reason that it begins with Beresheet<\/em>? It is because \u2018He has made known to His people the power of His works, to give them the inheritance of nations,\u2019 so that should the nations of the world say to Israel, \u2018You are robbers, for you have conquered the lands of seven nations,\u2019 they will tell them, \u2018The whole earth is the Creator\u2019s. He has created it and given it to whom He chooses. At His will he gave it to them, and at His will He took it from them and has given it to us.\u2019\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The same applies with the birthright. First He gave it to Esau, then took it from Esau and gave it to Jacob. We cannot say that birthright is not the same as lands because a land can be sold and given, while birthright is about facts, meaning the one who was born first is called \u201cfirstborn,\u201d and it cannot be changed. And yet, we see that birthright can also be sold, so we can say that it can be taken from one and given to another. Otherwise, how could Jacob buy his birthright from Esau, as it is written, \u201cand he sold his birthright to Jacob\u201d?<\/p>\n\n\n\n From this we see that birthright is similar to a land, which can be given. Thus, what does this answer that he gives here imply to us, that since a Klipa<\/em> precedes the fruit, being born first does not count as having the birthright?<\/p>\n\n\n\n To understand the matter we must first know what is a Klipa<\/em>, what is marrow, and what is the foreskin, for he calls Esau by the name \u201cforeskin,\u201d and what is a covenant, for he calls Jacob by the name \u201ccovenant.\u201d First we must state the purpose of creation. Afterwards we will be able to explain what is primary and what is not secondary, so as to know the matter of fruit and Klipa<\/em>, which must precede the fruit. What is this necessity, which implies that it cannot be otherwise?<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is known that the purpose of creation is to do good to His creations. For this reason, He has created a creature existence from absence, so that this creature could receive the delight and pleasure that He wants to give them. That creature is called a \u201cwill to receive in order to receive.\u201d It follows that we can only speak of something that has a desire to receive, or it is not regarded as a creature of which we can speak. A creature is called Kli<\/em> [vessel], and there is no light without a Kli<\/em>. This means that we can speak of light only when it is clothed in a Kli<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, there isn\u2019t this Kli<\/em>, called a \u201cdesire to receive delight and pleasure,\u201d \u201creception,\u201d once the correction called \u201cequivalence of form\u201d has been made, so as not to have the bread of shame. It is known that there is shame when one must receive something, as our sages said about the verse, \u201cChrome gorges for the sons of men.\u201d When a person is compelled to receive from people, his face changes and becomes as chrome. This is why there was the correction called \u201cTzimtzum<\/em> [restriction] and concealment,\u201d to receive pleasure only with the intention to bestow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It follows that we should discern two things: 1) This most important is the Kli<\/em>, called \u201cdesire to receive the delight and pleasure.\u201d Without this desire there is nothing to speak of. However, the Sitra<\/em> Achra<\/em> and the Klipot<\/em> [plural of Klipa<\/em>] extend from this discernment. The order of the cascading of the worlds comes to us as root, meaning that from this point extends open expansion with all the evil. It is as the ARI said, that the Tzimtzum<\/em> is the root of the judgment, meaning that by this there was a Tzimtzum<\/em> not to receive in order to receive, but only in order to bestow. The order was as explained in The Study of the Ten Sefirot<\/em> (Part 1), that initially, the Tzimtzum<\/em> was voluntary, meaning that there still wasn\u2019t the prohibition on receiving. Afterwards there was a prohibition on receiving, but there was still no one who wanted to receive in order to receive. That is, there was still no one who wanted to breach the prohibition of the Tzimtzum<\/em>. However, through Tzimtzum<\/em> Bet<\/em> [second restriction], a new entity was born\u2014someone who wants to receive in order to receive, though there were still no Klipot<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Klipot<\/em> were born after the breaking of the vessels that occurred in the world of Nekudim<\/em>, but there was still no structure of them. Rather, at that time the Klipot<\/em> were called \u201cVav<\/em> and a dot,\u201d and there was still no structure of worlds in them. Only after the sin of Adam HaRishon<\/em> with the tree of knowledge, when the Levushim<\/em> [dress\/clothing] fell into the Klipot<\/em>, the Klipot<\/em> received the structure of four worlds like the Kedusha<\/em> [holiness\/sanctity], and they are called \u201cthe four worlds ABYA<\/em> de<\/em> [of] Tuma\u2019a<\/em> [impurity].\u201d This is the matter presented in the \u201cIntroduction to the Book of Zohar\u201d (item 29): \u201cKnow that our work during our seventy years is divided in four:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The First Division is to obtain the excessive will to receive without restraints, in its full, corrupted measure from under the hands of the four impure worlds ABYA<\/em>. If we do not have that corrupted will to receive, we will not be able to correct it. Thus, the will to receive imprinted in the body at birth is insufficient. Rather, it must also be a vehicle for the impure Klipot<\/em> for no less than thirteen years. This means that the Klipot<\/em> must dominate it and give it of their lights, for their lights increase its will to receive, for the fulfillments with which the Klipot<\/em> provide the will to receive only expand and enhance the demands of the will to receive. If one does not overcome it through Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>, and purifies the will to receive to turn it into bestowal, one\u2019s will to receive expands throughout one\u2019s life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Second Division is from thirteen years onward. At that point, the point in the heart, which is the posterior of the Nefesh<\/em> of Kedusha<\/em> [holiness\/sanctity], is given strength. Although it is dressed in his will to receive at birth, it only begins to awaken after thirteen years, and then one begins to enter the system of the worlds of Kedusha<\/em>, to the extent that one engages in Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>. The primary aim of that time is to obtain and intensify the spiritual will to receive. Hence, this degree, which comes past the thirteen years, is deemed holiness. This is considered the holy maid who serves her mistress, which is the holy Shechina<\/em> [Divinity], since the maid brings one to Lishma<\/em> [for Her sake] and he is rewarded with the instilling of the Shechina<\/em>. And the final degree in this division is that he will fall passionately in love with the Creator, as the poet says, \u201cWhen I remember Him, He does not let me sleep.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now we can understand what is Kedusha<\/em> and what is Klipa<\/em>. Kedusha<\/em> comes from the words Kodesh Lehashem<\/em> [dedicated to the Creator]. It means that it does not belong to us, meaning that it does not belong to our domain, but that we dedicate it to the Creator. That is, he takes it out from the domain of laypeople and admits it into the domain of Kedusha<\/em>. However, it cannot be said that he admits it into the domain of Kedusha<\/em> if it was not previously in his domain, and then it can be said that he has taken it out from his own domain and admitted it into the domain of Kedusha<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, a person must first be in the domain of the Klipa<\/em> until the age of thirteen years, as it is written in the \u201cIntroduction to the Book of Zohar,\u201d at which time he feels that he has his own authority because the Klipa<\/em>, called \u201cwill to receive in order to receive,\u201d is called \u201cdisparity of form,\u201d which separates him from the Creator. This matter of vessels of reception that one acquires while being under the domain of the Klipa<\/em> until the age of thirteen years lets him feel that he is the landlord, meaning that he can do whatever he wants because he does not feel any authority but his own.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For this reason, when he is told, after thirteen years, that now is the time when you must annul your authority, and say that there is only the authority of the Creator, he begins to think and contemplate, \u201cWhy do I need to annul my authority and say that only the Creator is the landlord and I am His servant, and I have no possession, but as our sages said, \u2018He who buys a servant buys his master.\u2019 That is, I need to serve the Creator so as to bring Him contentment.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n At that time, man\u2019s body, called \u201cwill to receive,\u201d makes a strong argument: \u201cFirst I must believe that there is a connection between the Creator and the creatures, and then I must see that it is worthwhile to believe that the Creator is the owner. But for this I must annul my authority and see only that there is contentment to the Creator. What is my gain in this?\u201d However, he understands\u2014once he believes that there is a connection between the Creator and the creatures\u2014meaning that all He wants is to do good to His creations, and all that he needs to see in this state is how the Creator serves him. That is, the Creator is the servant and man is the owner. He is the owner and the Creator must serve man, for man is the master and the Creator is the slave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, when a person is told that he must know that the truth is that the Creator is the landlord and we, creatures, have no say in the world, and whether we accept His kingship over us or we are secular who do not want to assume His kingship, nothing helps us. He does what He wants, and the creatures must obey His orders against their will, as our sages said (Avot,<\/em> Chapter 3, 20), \u201cMan\u2019s debt is collected whether willingly or unwillingly.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n It follows that even if one does not agree to what he is being told, the fact that he does not want to believe does not change reality\u2014that the Creator is the landlord and does what He wants. However, a person cannot see the truth, and this is why we do not want to believe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But when a person does not believe it, he cannot take upon himself to be a servant of the Creator, meaning believe that the Creator is the master and we are His servants. Rather, this applies specifically to those with faith.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, this is not real faith. There is a type of people who believe that the Lord is the Creator and that He has created the world with a purpose called \u201cto do good to His creations.\u201d They also believe that the Creator has commanded us through Moses to observe the Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>, that He has given us, but believe all this for profit, meaning that He will pay us for exerting in the work of keeping Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>. They have what to rely on, as our sages said (Avot<\/em>, Chapter 2, 16), \u201cIf you learned much Torah, you are given a great reward. You can trust your landlord to pay for your work, and know that the reward of the righteous is in the future [implying the end of correction].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n We therefore see that there is the matter of believing in the Creator and in His law, and keeping every single Mitzva<\/em>, slight or serious. However, it is all measured by profitability, which is in order to receive reward, called Lo<\/em> Lishma<\/em> [not for Her sake]. However, we must remember what our sages said, \u201cFrom Lo<\/em> Lishma<\/em> we come to Lishma<\/em>.\u201d Thus, this is already regarded as a degree of Kedusha<\/em>. But when one is told, after thirteen years, that now is the time when you must annul your authority and say that there is no other authority in the world, and you are nothing but a slave serving the master not in order to receive reward, the body resists it. At that time the main work begins, since it is against nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, a person must believe above reason and tell his body: \u201cYou must know that you cannot work in bestowing contentment upon the Creator without any reward, since you were born with a nature of wanting to receive, and that nature is necessary, for only this is the whole creation, as it is known that only the will to receive, called \u2018craving and desire to receive pleasure\u2019 is called \u2018existence from absence.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n It therefore follows that we are called \u201ccreatures\u201d precisely pertaining to the will to receive, which we can call \u201ccreation.\u201d This desire is found in all the degrees and worlds of Kedusha<\/em>. However, in Kedusha<\/em>, this will to receive is corrected with a correction of intention to bestow. It follows that the basis is the will to receive, and the difference between Kedusha<\/em> and Tuma\u2019a<\/em> and between life and death is only in the intention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This means that if the reception is in order to bestow, it is called Kedusha<\/em>, since it is equivalence of form. Equivalence of form is called Dvekut<\/em>, as our sages said about the verse, \u201cAnd to cleave unto Him.\u201d They interpreted, \u201ccleave unto His attributes: as He is merciful, so you are merciful,\u201d and for this reason he is adhered to the life of lives. It follows that life extends to him from above.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But if he cannot place the intention to bestow on the act, then he is in disparity of form from the Creator, since He is the giver, and the creatures want to receive. For this reason, they are separated from the life of lives, and naturally have only death. This is called Klipa<\/em>, although it comes in the basis of creation. Otherwise, if there is no will to receive there, there is no one to speak of. And yet, if there is no correction of bestowal over it, it is called Klipa<\/em>, Sitra<\/em> Achra<\/em>, \u201cangel of death,\u201d etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to the order of correction, we see that first there must be a desire and craving to receive the pleasures, and then we say that we must know that we must not receive with the intention of self-love. And although there is a great desire to receive the pleasure, I must still overcome the lust and work with myself in such a way that I want to receive the pleasure provided I can aim the reception I will receive now only because the Creator wants me to receive the pleasure, and this is why I am receiving, since I want to please the Creator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He has already cancelled his own authority, meaning he does not want to receive anything inside the Kli<\/em> called \u201cself-love.\u201d But since the Creator wants him to receive, he says, \u201cNow I want to receive delight and pleasure because the Creator wants it, and I want to satisfy the Creator\u2019s will.\u201d Therefore, now he receives the delight and pleasure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But in order for man to achieve this degree, regarded as \u201cHis only desire is to bestow contentment upon the Creator,\u201d here begins the real work, since there are two discernments to make in matters of work: 1) The act. It is difficult for us to relinquish pleasures, regardless of the kind of pleasure. Take, for example, the pleasure of rest. When a person must go to work in order to receive a salary, he goes to work in construction or in a factory, so it is certainly difficult to relinquish the pleasure of rest. But since he will suffer more if he has nothing to eat, he relinquishes rest and takes upon himself labor, since by this he will achieve a greater pleasure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In what is it great? He gains two things here: not suffering from not having anything to eat, or the suffering of shame when he has nothing to wear. Also, he will have the pleasure of eating and the joy of having nice clothes. This is not so when he relinquishes the pleasure of rest but does not suffer at not having rest, although we can say that when he relinquishes rest he feels suffering of sleep, besides missing the pleasure of sleep. Also, when he works, we can say that in addition to relinquishing the pleasure of rest, he also has the suffering of movement. It is especially so when one is doing physical work\u2014he suffers during the work, as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, this suffering is not like the suffering one feels when he is hungry, or when he must be with people in a place of celebration, such as a Brit<\/em> [circumcision ceremony] or a wedding, and he has nothing to wear. This makes it easier for him to give up the rest and assume the trouble of labor, since we see what everyone does\u2014giving up rest and going to work. Thus, the suffering from not having must be harder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The same applies when a person is told, \u201cGive up the rest and start working in Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>.\u201d He immediately asks, as in corporeality: \u201cWhat will be my reward for giving up rest? I want to see the profit.\u201d Maimonides says about this (end of Hilchot Teshuva<\/em>): \u201cYour reward will be in this world and in the next world, and you will be saved from affliction and from every misfortune.\u201d At that time he can believe what he is told and keep Torah and Mitzvot<\/em> in practice for the Creator. That is, by keeping Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>, he is aiming to what the Creator has commanded us through Moses, and in return we will receive reward for our labor and toil of relinquishing many pleasures that the Torah has forbidden us. In return, we receive reward, just as those who work at a factory or in construction, because we are paid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The same applies to spirituality. That is, we work for the landlord. It is not that he is the owner of some factory. Rather, we believe that he is the owner of the entire world, and we work for Him. We are told, \u201cGive up the job you have for a small company that pays you very little, and work for the big boss, the owner of the world.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, this brings up the question: \u201cWhy is everyone not working for the owner of the world?\u201d The answer is simple: They do not see an instantaneous reward. Rather, they must believe in the reward\u2014that we will receive when the work is done. For this reason, not everyone can believe in the reward. Hence, since the reward is doubtful and we must believe that in the end we will be paid, not many people want it. Because normally, people work for a guaranteed reward and not for a questionable one, there is a big difference between corporeality and spirituality. However, we must know that the only difference is that here in spirituality, the reward is not instantaneous, but we must believe. This is the only difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, we see that people come and want to keep Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>, although the whole time until they came they were among secular people, and they come and say that they want to repent. When they are asked about the reason that they want to change the way that they were used to, they say that they no longer find meaning in life, meaning in self-love. Because he (a person) does not have anything to receive and put into them (into his desires of self-love), since he has nothing to give them (to the desires of self-love), therefore he wants to keep Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He has heard that one can receive pleasure from Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>, so he will have something with which to delight his will to receive. That is, as long as he sees that he can nourish the will to receive with corporeal pleasures, he has no need to change his way. But if he hears that there is a matter of faith, and that there is a master who leads the world, who did not create the world for no reason, but rather for some purpose, and the goal is called \u201cto do good to His creations,\u201d when he hears this, if he is dissatisfied with corporeal pleasures since he cannot find the meaning of life in them, for which it is worthwhile to live and suffer in the world, since each one is suffering according to his degree, so when he hears that there is a place where there is something that illuminates something in life, he can come out of the corporeal pleasures, although we said above that in corporeal pleasures he does not need to believe. But in spirituality, he is in doubt, and must believe that in the end, the glory will come, meaning that in the end he will receive reward. But since he is dissatisfied with corporeal pleasures he can shift to the side of Kedusha<\/em> and observe Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, when one is immersed in corporeal lusts and finds satisfaction in them, even if temporary, and then he sees that he has no satisfaction, he is already as an infant captured by idol-worshippers, and he is powerless to emerge from their control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, even after such people take upon themselves the burden of Torah and Mitzvot<\/em>, sometimes corporeal lusts awaken in them, and then the work is difficult for them. However, we must know that the fact that corporal lusts have awakened in them, meaning that they are beginning to feel flavors in them that they did not taste before, and also all those people who grew up with religious upbringing, who have been keeping Torah and Mitzvot<\/em> since childhood, when they begin to do the work of bestowal there awakens in them greater taste for corporeality than when they first began to engage in work of bestowal. It is as our sages said (Sanhedrin<\/em>, p 75b), \u201cRabbi Yitzhak said, \u2018Since the day when the Temple was ruined, the taste of intercourse was taken away, and given to transgressors.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n We should interpret \u201cSince the day when the Temple was ruined\u201d to mean when the Kedusha<\/em> in man\u2019s heart was ruined. \u201cThe taste of intercourse was taken away\u201d: The term, \u201cintercourse,\u201d incorporates all the pleasures. \u201cAnd was given to transgressors\u201d: This is perplexing. Why do transgressors deserve to feel pleasure in corporeal things more than those who are not transgressors? It is as if they deserve the reward of feeling more pleasure than others for committing transgressions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To understand this we need to see what is customary in the world. If a person can hire a person for a low salary, he will not pay him more. Indeed, every person strives to have workers who will work for them and do everything he asks while paying him less. It is irrelevant to say that he will pay him more than the worker asks. It follows that when speaking of the work of the Creator, when the evil inclination comes to a person and tells him, \u201cBreach the Mitzvot<\/em> of the Torah,\u201d the person tells it, \u201cWhat will you give me?\u201d Then the evil inclination tells him: \u201cIn return for obeying me I will give you, for example, two hundred grams of pleasure.\u201d So he tells it, \u201cFor two hundred grams of pleasure I do not want to breach the Creator\u2019s commandments.\u201d Then the evil inclination must add another hundred grams until a person can no longer pass up such a delight and must obey the evil inclination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It follows that to the extent that a person appreciates the sin, to that extent it is difficult for one to breach the Mitzva<\/em>. And since it is difficult to breach the Creator\u2019s commandments, and there is a rule that for hard work you must pay well, hence, to the extent that it is difficult for him to commit the transgression, to that extent the evil inclination must give a great reward, meaning a great pleasure in return for the transgression. But when it is not so difficult to breach the Creator\u2019s commandment, the evil inclination does not need to give him such a great reward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It therefore follows that secular people, who do not keep Torah and Mitzvot<\/em> at all, do not feel that they are committing any transgression, as our sages said (Yoma<\/em>, 86b), \u201cIf a person commits a transgression and repeats it, it becomes to him as permitted.\u201d Thus, the evil inclination does not need to give them a taste for the transgression, since it is not difficult for them to transgress so as to need payment in return for breaching the Mitzvot<\/em>. This is why they do not feel a great taste in the transgression, since he always finds workers who want to work for him, so he does not need to pay them with great pleasures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is not so with people who do not wish to commit transgressions, who feel during the act that they are going to commit a transgression and it is difficult for them to do it. Because of it, the evil inclination must let them feel a great flavor in the transgression, or they will not listen to it and keep its orders. Hence, it must pay them with great pleasures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n By this we can interpret the words, \u201cSince the ruin of the Temple.\u201d That is, when there is no work of Kedusha<\/em> in man\u2019s heart, \u201cthe taste has been taken away,\u201d meaning the general taste of pleasures, called \u201cintercourse,\u201d \u201cand was given to transgressors,\u201d meaning that as long as one feels that he is committing a transgression, he feels the flavor. But \u201cIf a person commits a transgression and repeats it, it becomes to him as permitted.\u201d Then the evil inclination no longer gives him pleasure, since he is working without any reward because he feels no heaviness in committing the transgressions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, the orthodox have a big mistake in thinking that the secular enjoy corporeal pleasures. Because they are serving the evil inclination without any reward, since their whole vitality is their objection to religion and they do not have the pleasures that the religious think because the evil inclination does not reward for nothing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, do not be surprised if a person sees that when he has begun the work of bestowal he has received more pleasure for corporeal lusts. It is not because he has suffered a descent. On the contrary, because now he does not want to receive in order to receive, but wants only to bestow, when the evil inclination comes to distract him from the work of bestowal it gives him a greater taste for corporeal pleasures so he will listen to it and will not be able to overcome his will to receive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But before he has begun the work of bestowal, when he engaged in corporeal lusts, he did not have such a great desire for corporeal lusts, since he was engaged in corporeal lusts without much pleasure. But now that he has begun the work of bestowal, if he does not feel a great taste, the evil inclination will not be able to do anything because he will not listen to it. It follows that to the extent that one moves away from self-love he begins to feel greater taste (in corporeal lusts), since otherwise he will not obey it (the evil inclination) at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It therefore follows that one need not be alarmed if in the middle of the work he receives a passion for corporeal lusts, even if previously he did not have such lusts. But now, because he needs to constantly correct the vessels of reception, it means that the greater the pleasure, the greater is his desire. When he corrects the desire, meaning overcomes it, each time he sorts out a desire called Kli<\/em>, by taking it out of the Klipot<\/em> and admitting it into Kedusha<\/em>. For this reason, each time he is given a greater lust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, each time he should pray to be given strength from above to overcome this Kli<\/em>, called \u201cdesire.\u201d This is called \u201ccorrection of the Kelim<\/em> at the root of his soul.\u201d These Kelim<\/em> that he must correct, (their correction) begins from the Kelim<\/em>, meaning from a desire to receive corporeality, and finally comes to correcting the Kelim<\/em>, meaning the desires for reception of spiritual things. And he must ask the Creator to give him the force of the Masach<\/em> [screen] over all of them, meaning the assistance from above, as our sages said, \u201cHe who comes to purify is aided.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now we shall come to clarify what we asked, 1) about what the holy Zohar<\/em> explains, that he gave the birthright to Jacob although Esau was born first. It explains that Esau is a Klipa<\/em>, and this is why he came out first and Jacob emerged next. It is so because the order is that the Klipa<\/em> precedes the fruit. We asked, \u201cBut there is a simple answer, as RASHI presents in the beginning of the portion, Beresheet<\/em> [In the beginning], as it is written, \u201c\u2018He has made known to His people the power of His works,\u2019 so that should the nations say, \u2018You are robbers,\u2019 they will tell them, \u2018The whole earth is the Creator\u2019s. He has created it and gave it to whom He chooses. At His will he gave it to them, and at His will He took it from them and has given it to us.\u2019\u201d Thus, he adds another reason here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2) Why must the Klipa<\/em> precede the fruit? With the above said, it is simple: since the Creator created the world and Creation is only a Kli<\/em>. It is known that the light is not considered Creation, but rather \u201cexistence from existence.\u201d Therefore, it cannot be said that He first had to create a correction for Creation, before He has anything to correct. That is, first He created the Kli<\/em>, called \u201cwill to receive,\u201d and then a correction called \u201cTzimtzum<\/em> [restriction] and concealment\u201d emerged on that Kli<\/em>. Afterwards there extended to the lower ones the discernment of \u201cthe nations of the world,\u201d which is the will to receive in order to receive, namely a Kli<\/em> without correction. A Kli<\/em> without correction is called Klipa<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore, it cannot be any other way because it is impossible to correct something that has not been born in the world. It follows that by saying, \u201cHe created it,\u201d it means that He has created the world according to the applied order, meaning that first emerges a deficiency, and then it is possible to correct the deficiency. Hence, according to the rule of root and branch, the receiver in order to receive must emerge first, which is the opposite of the Creator, meaning disparity of form, called \u201cnations of the world,\u201d as it is written in the holy Zohar<\/em>, \u201cAmong the nations of the world, all the good that they do, they do it for themselves.\u201d This is called a \u201cKlipa<\/em> that precedes the fruit,\u201d meaning that the Klipa<\/em> is considered that which is unfit for eating because the abundance enters the vessels of reception after the correction of the Tzimtzum<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But afterwards comes the correction called \u201cin order to bestow,\u201d which is regarded as Jacob. This is called a \u201cfruit\u201d because now there is a correction on the will to receive: to bestow contentment upon the Creator. Now it is possible to eat fruits since there is equivalence of form here between the light and the Kli<\/em>, and then the Kli<\/em> is rewarded with fruits. But concerning the Sitra<\/em> Achra<\/em>, the holy Zohar<\/em> says, \u201cAnother God is sterile and does not bear fruit.\u201d This is why it says that Jacob is called \u201ccovenant,\u201d where making a covenant means that there is equivalence between them. It is as it is written, \u201cFor it is a token of an everlasting covenant between Me and the sons of Israel; it is an everlasting token.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n It follows that the answer that Rabbi Yitzhak gave, because it is \u201cthe power of His works,\u201d is the same answer that He has created it according to the order that the Klipa<\/em> precedes the fruit. The branch and root come out, where the Klipa<\/em> must come first, which is receiving in order to receive, and then emerges the correction, which is Israel or Jacob. It follows that when it says, \u201cHe took it from them and has given it to us,\u201d it is to correct, since such is the order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Article No. 30, 1986 In the portion, Balak, The Zohar writes (item 15), \u201cIf you say that so the Creator wished\u2014to give […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"parent":6243,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}}},"topic":[26],"class_list":["post-9893","book","type-book","status-publish","hentry","topic-rabash"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n