|
Kabbalah and Philosophy
Lesson 3
A fraction of truth developed by the human intellect
- When will it be possible to submit the Kabbalah to
humanity?/li>
- The role of Kabbalah
- What is spirituality?
- The theft from the books of the prophets
- The philosophers' mistake
Why don't we have philosophy like Islam, Christianity, ancient China,
ancient India, Greece, and Rome have? As I've said, it is because we
did not have to research humanity, life and nature, using the human
intellect. From the beginning, we have been approaching the research
through the development of the point in the heart and through the upper
world.
Abraham from whom emerged the group called "the nation of Israel",
actually began researching the spiritual world immediately. In the
"Book of Creation" he immediately describes to us the structure of the
worlds, what they exist for, what the source of life is, and what the
purpose of life is. So there was no room left for philosophy or any
intellectual assumptions. What was left is only to actually achieve the
goal.
Look how much and in what way philosophers have written about the
source and purpose of life. They were great people with great minds,
and they invested a lot in getting to know the forces of reality.
However even such great minds as Aristotle or Appleton could never
touch the answer to these questions.
It is simply impossible, because a different sense is necessary. It is
like a cat, which is not able to comprehend what happens to a person.
As much as the cat may develop, on the level of a cat, it would not
help. This is why we never needed this type of development. Those who
have developed at a cat's level finally arrive to a state in which they
know nothing. But now they are like a cat, at least they know that they
have no knowledge and no benefit, either from the technological,
scientific, philosophical or cultural advancements. All of these
advancements only bring us sufferings.
What can be done?
Now humanity will do some self reflection, and then the wisdom of
Kabbalah will be offered to mankind, and they will be ready to receive
it. It is as if Kabbalah was waiting for humanity to develop. The wisdom
was always there, and only now it is necessary to present it to all
nations.
The spiritual is a force without a body
"And that is what the Kabbalists define by the name "spirituality",
which they discuss, that it has no image of time and place, or of any
of the corporeal values whatsoever." Spirituality is something
that has no time and space; there are no corporal values in it such as
those we live in. It is something completely separate from us.
"And in my opinion the entire field of philosophy has wrapped
itself in a Talis which is not its own" because it discusses the
Creator, spirituality, "because it stole some definitions from the
wisdom of Kabbalah, and they have flavored it with human comprehension,
since otherwise it would not have crossed their mind to fabricate such
wisdom". Indeed if they wouldn't have heard some discussions about
spiritual forces, seemingly disconnected from human beings, then they
would simply worship all sorts of physical objects.
Even recently when I was in England I saw ads in the newspaper for
people who were buying an apartment and were looking for someone to
clean the apartment of ghosts. So in this form they exist, never
thinking about anything spiritual. People would be living like men who
lived in caves if humanity wouldn't have stolen the relation to the
spiritual world. (Baal HaSulam writes that the philosophers stole from
the books of the prophets). Then they began to "research" it with the
vessels they had, and that is how philosophy developed.
"But it (spirituality) is a force which is concealed, meaning that
it is not clothed in a normal body of this world, but it is a force
with no body." If it is a force without a body, which isn't
clothed in matter, then how can we approach, grasp, study or feel it?
That is why philosophy, which thought that this force is related to the
body and clothed in it, dealt with it that way and constructed shapes
around these forces which are like bodies. So they may say that the
soul is related to the breath coming through the nose or other very
primitive things, because they accepted that spirituality clothes in
corporeality. As Kabbalists determine that spirituality is not at all
related to corporeality (that there is a clear cut between them), it
becomes clear that humanity is not capable of researching the
spiritual.
A spiritual vessel is called a force
"And it should be noted here that the issue of force in the
spiritual, does not mean the spiritual light itself," Why? We do
not discuss the light either. "Because this spiritual light is
drawn directly from His Essence Blessed Be He. And if so" that it
is drawn from the Creator "therefore it is considered to be equal
to His Essence Blessed Be He" It is like the Creator. Therefore
the light that comes from the Creator but is outside of our vessel is
not discussed; we only discuss our impression of whatever is outside of
us. "Meaning, that in the spiritual light as well, we have no
apprehension or attainment that we could define by some name or
definition, because even the name "Light" is borrowed and not real.
Therefore it is necessary to know that this name "force" without a
body is said specifically on the aspect of "spiritual vessel". this
means that when we refer to lights we do not mean real lights that
are outside of us, but the reaction we have to something that comes
from the Creator; the influence of the Creator on us. Our reaction is
called light.
Lights and vessels
"And it requires an explanation, how do the wise Kabbalists
distinguish the lights, which the wisdom is entirely filled with their
discernments?" (If we don't relate to the light?) He says,
"Indeed these discernments are not discussing the lights themselves
but only the impression of the vessel which is the above mentioned
force, impressed by the light that comes across it." It is just
like some waveform that hits my ear drum, and through the ear drum I
begin to discern its motions. If my ear drum was torn or not
functioning correctly then I would not feel that there is anything
outside. But if it is corrected, it can receive all of the motions that
are outside. In the same way, I interpret according to my own
attributes the external influence in the most correct way. These are
actually all of the corrections that we need to go through so that each
of our senses will be changed according to the light, while the way we
will experience it is determined according to our nature.
Vessels and lights (the interpretation of the words)
"And here should be added the issue of the distinction between
the gift and the love born by it. Since the lights, meaning the
impression of the vessel, which is attainable," The vessel is
impressed. When I am impressed I am able to feel how I am impressed and
what I am impressed from. I can measure it and examine it. In me remain
Reshimot through which I can go back to that sensation, write
about them, and transfer them to others. This impression is called
"matter and form" together, because the impression is the form, and the
force above which builds this form is the "matter".
But the love that is born ".out of the impression, is
distinguished to be a shape without matter. Meaning, if we are dealing
with the abstraction of the love from the matter of the gift (as if it
was never clothed in some concrete gift, but only in the abstract name
'the love of God Blessed Be Him'), then it is distinguished as form.
The dealing with it is distinguished as reception in form."
I receive gifts, and according to the gifts themselves I can not
ascertain who gives the gifts. However, according to the shape of the
gifts and all sorts of signs that I am able to discern with my
intellect, I begin to determine who the giver of the gifts is. Not Him,
but His relation to me. Because the sender of the gifts seemingly knows
me, loves me, and wants to benefit me. He sends them to me in such a
way that I begin through these gifts to develop a relationship with Him.
This relationship is called love, and this sensation is already not
related to the gifts, but I sense and relate to Him. Even if there
would be no more gifts, I already built a relationship between us which
is beyond the gifts. Then it is considered that I am not involved with
matter but with form. Matter is the gifts themselves, and the form
(which is constructed above the matter) is called reception of form.
We are already dealing with the connection between us.
"But it is considered to be real, with no similarity to formational
philosophy, because the spirit of this love is what truly remains in
attainment in a way which is completely abstracted from the gift,
meaning the light itself." A person, who begins to sense the
relation of the Creator to him, immediately starts to develop emotions
accordingly. Those emotions eventually reach a form called love. There
are in this process many forms that the person experiences, from the
formation of a simple connection and then to many more. This starts
from some descriptions of the giver of the gift, until he begins to
elevate above the gifts and connect with the giver without the gifts.
Then he receives out of this process "intellect of form "or "reception
of form". These are good developmental stages for a person to go
through.
|
|